Connect with us

News

Scientists are Still Preparing to Spray the Skies in 2018

Published

on

Like this article? Get the latest from The Mind Unleashed in your inbox. Sign up right here.

Nearly a year ago, we reported that notorious weather modification (geoengineering) proponent, Harvard professor David Keith and his partner would perform an experiment to spray the sky with aluminum oxide and other geoengineering materials in 2018.

It was reported that this would be the first major test for geoengineering, more specifically “SRM” (Solar Radiation Management). From what I can gather this experiment is still going to go ahead, but a specific date has not been announced. Last year, they said the experiment would occur this year, so it might be happening soon.

Keith’s experiment which may happen in 2018 would be officially one of the earliest geoengineering-related experiments to be conducted outside of some controlled computer model or laboratory setting.

Although little has been said about it since its announce nearly a year ago, recently David Keith did an interview to promote Geoengineering. Geoengineering with sulfur was mentioned. Reading from the interview:

SPIEGEL: Whoever injects sulfur into the stratosphere will put heavy risks on health and environment. This doesn’t frighten you?

Keith: No doubt there are considerable risks. Eventually the sulfur will settle down into the lower atmosphere. And then there’s the ozone loss risk.”

That’s interesting, because remember the rain tests taken in 2016 that proved Northern California rain contained 100x the legal limit of aluminum? Well more rain tests were taken in the region, and this time sulfur was found.

Nearly forgot – the San Francisco rainwater which tested positive for aluminum, barium, strontium, titanium and iron…

Posted by Patrick Roddie on Wednesday, March 21, 2018

 

San Francisco rain collected 3-12–18 tests positive for aluminum, barium, strontium, titanium – and perhaps most importantly – iron.

Posted by Patrick Roddie on Tuesday, March 20, 2018

Both Harvard professors, David Keith and Frank Keutsch were planning on launching a high altitude balloon, fixed and tethered to a gondola equipped with sensors and propellers, from a site in Tuscon, Arizona this year.

After a few tests on initial engineering things, this “StratoCruiser” would spray probably nano-particles as geoengineering patents have suggested, of materials such as aluminum oxide, sulfur dioxide, calcium carbonate, or others into the stratosphere.

Then, the sensors would take measurement of the reflectivity of the particles being sprayed, the amount that they coalesce or disperse, and the exact way the interact with the atmosphere’s other content.

According to MIT Technology Review:

“In an earlier interview with MIT Technology Review, Keith stressed that the experiments would not be a binary test of geoengineering itself. But they should provide useful information about the proposed method that he has closely studied, known as solar radiation management. 

The basic idea is that spraying certain types of particles into the stratosphere could help reflect more heat back into space. Scientists believe it could work because nature already does it. Large volcanic eruptions in the past have blasted tens of millions of tons of sulfur dioxide into the sky, which contributed to lower global temperatures in subsequent months.”

NASA however, sort of beat them to this type of “experiment.” NASA performed an experiment that really seemed to be about how to mold public perception, when a few months after the Harvard announcement, they sprayed the sky off the coast of Maryland with barium via a sounding rocket, and they colored the toxic metals with bright colors and told the public to watch for the sprayed skies as if it were some type of spectacle to behold, or natural beauty.

According to Forbes:

“During the eight-minute flight, ten canisters around the size of soft drink cans were thrown out into space from six to 12 miles away from the main payload and altitudes between 96 and 124 miles high. These canisters spewed blue-green and red smokes that formed into artificial clouds that could be seen from Earth.”

“NASA has developed a multi-canister ampoule ejection system that will allow scientists to gather information from the colorful clouds over a much larger area than previously possible, when the tracers were just deployed from the main payload. The vapor itself is formed through the interaction of barium, strontium and cupric-oxide.”

Barium and strontium: the geoengineer’s mix, along with aluminum.

Back to the first experiment that should happen this year, if you live in Tuscon, Arizona you might want to be careful going outside during this experiment. Or should you?

Because a mountain of evidence suggests that militaries and institutions around the planet already spray the stratosphere all the time with high altitude jets, making trails that expand without end and form a haze in the sky, followed by rain tests that display 100 times the legal limit of aluminum.

We in fact do know the exact institutions involved with the creation of the field of geoengineering, and the “defense” contractors involved with what appears to be continuing it today.

Corporations such as Raytheon have been cited as holding “HAARP patents” for certain types of energy that would be beamed into the stratosphere or ionosphere to interact with the sprayed metallic particles and affect weather systems.

Who works with defense contractors and the military on top secret, extremely far reaching projects? The CIA tends to of course, and perhaps that is why their director John Brennan mentioned in 2016 that the world should accept “SRM” and have the skies sprayed to combat global warming.

He wants a paradigm of open, accepted geoengineering and “solar radiation management.” He did mention in the same Council on Foreign Relations speech that some countries may be in opposition to the plan to spray the skies because they might be affected.

Perhaps he was referring to Iran. After all, in 2011 Iran’s president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad openly accused the US and its allies of using weather warfare technology over the Mediterranean to affect the rain current and cause drought in Iran.

Well, Iran is still in a drought: and I’m willing to bet the “technology” used over the Mediterranean that he was referring to is sprayed aerosols over a US allied country, used in conjunction with the HAARP-type facilities that work with the sprayed aerosols.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGcilez__Hs

Perhaps that can also explain why monsoon rain and flooding has occurred in recent years in India, and places where that rain current goes after it skips Iran. Iran gets a drought, the next countries to receive the rain get flooding. That seems to be the paradigm that high level people pushing geoengineering want.

So really, the work of David Keith is nothing more than publicity, a real facade to make it seem as if the world’s most powerful entities aren’t already spraying nearly every day in places all over the world.

Little bite sized chunks of publicity, normalizing this concept in the minds of most people, this is their way of opening the door to a very scary future where questioning the safety or ethics of geoengineering is akin to questioning something we rely upon for life.

Even worse, just imagine what would happen if the government had the public’s consent to openly spray the skies every day, to haze out the sun and perform “solar radiation management” to stop climate change. Do people even know what kind of power differential that would create between these players and the common people? The entire mainstream media is pushing for geoengineering, promoting it right now: look it up. They are blatantly promoting geoengineering because big money wants them to say that.

Governments, especially the US, have a long history of experimenting on their own citizens if they ever get the opportunity. Things have been sprayed on cities, bacteria has been sprayed on San Francisco, poor southern Blacks have been infected with Syphilis in experiments that lasted decades and decades. What do people think will happen if every day, something is sprayed out of airplanes on us openly and we have to trust it’s just aluminum and barium?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1i7hQRQM52E&t=9s

Remember: when you go outside and smell that powdery, static electricity type smell in the air and it follows spraying in the sky that can be clearly observed, a lot of evidence suggests you might be smelling aluminum that has been sprayed. If you ever smell aluminum in the air, or on your clothes after you come inside, think about what that might be.

If you don’t believe the skies are being sprayed, understand that spraying is periodical. In some months for unknown reasons they spray a lot and sometimes they barely ever do. Sometimes the stuff falls down quick and you can smell it, and sometimes it stays up in the air. If you don’t believe it, watch this video.

After that blatant spraying in Sacramento, rain tests proved that 100x the legal limit of aluminum and 2x the legal limit of barium was in Sacramento rainwater: exactly paralleling geoengineering patents for sprayed aerosols.

The man who brought the rain samples to a lab, Patrick Roddie, gave a lot of important info in this interview that was viewed over 300,000 times. The content of this interview was even translated into Spanish and reported by Russia Today.

This is an issue that will define the next several decades and haunt our children and grandchildren for decades more if we don’t pay attention. Please share this with as many people as possible.


Image credit: Goddessontheloose

Typos, corrections and/or news tips? Email us at [email protected]

Corruption

Chris Cuomo “indefinitely” gone from CNN after his deep role in brother’s sex scandal is revealed

Published

on

Like this article? Get the latest from The Mind Unleashed in your inbox. Sign up right here.

CNN anchor Chris Cuomo was suspended indefinitely by CNN on Tuesday after it was revealed by the New York Attorney General’s Office that the star anchor, the most popular on the news network, was deeply involved in assisting his scandal-embroiled brother, former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, amid a flurry of sexual harassment allegations that ultimately led to him resigning.

While Chris Cuomo had apologized in the past for advising his brother’s senior aides – effectively shattering the wall typically standing between policymakers and journalists – the thousands of pages released by Attorney General Letitia James show that the anchor played a deeply intimate role in damage control efforts stemming from the accusations.

The network and its top leadership, including president Jeff Zucker, had backed their star anchor to the hilt in recent months despite accumulating info showing Cuomo’s breach of basic journalistic standards. The anchor also had apologized for advising the governor while simultaneously downplaying or omitting the extent of his direct involvement in the scandal.

Late Tuesday, the network released a statement acknowledging that “the documents, which we were not privy to before their public release, raise serious questions.”

“When Chris admitted to us that he had offered advice to his brother’s staff, he broke our rules and we acknowledged that publicly,” the statement explained. “However, these documents point to a greater level of involvement in his brother’s efforts than we previously knew. As a result, we have suspended Chris indefinitely, pending further evaluation.”

Text messages show that Chris Cuomo clamored to play an increasingly direct role in the scandal, ranging from offers to draft statements for his brother to demands that he play a commanding role in strategic matters. Cuomo also looked into potential angles for news reports and researched the women who accused his brother of sexual misconduct.

“Please let me help with the prep,” Cuomo wrote at to his brother’s top aides as evidence damning the governor mounted.

The move to indefinitely suspend the argumentative and charismatic anchor came as a shock to some anchors, who were aware that he was dear to CNN management. CNN president Zucker also declined to discipline him as reports poured in about his misconduct, reports New York Times.

Chris Cuomo had long admitted that for him, the matter was about “family first, job second.”

“I can be objective about just about any topic, but not about my family,” he said on May 20. He also played down his fervent role in the scandal, claiming that he had been haplessly “looped into calls” with the governor’s inner circle, which he claims was a “mistake” that spilled over onto his work life and placed his CNN colleagues in a “bad spot.”

Typos, corrections and/or news tips? Email us at [email protected]

Continue Reading

Corruption

Jeffrey Epstein’s pilot testifies: Clinton, Trump, Prince Andrew among “Lolita Express” passengers

Published

on

Like this article? Get the latest from The Mind Unleashed in your inbox. Sign up right here.

Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime pilot took the stand on Tuesday, the second day of Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial, and detailed the names of famous passengers who rode in the private jet of the disgraced financier who has been accused of a range of crimes, including sex trafficking minors.

Testifying at the trial of Maxwell, who was Epstein’s girlfriend and alleged co-conspirator, pilot Larry Visoski explained how he met a number of notable and powerful people. The names included Prince Andrew, Donald Trump (before he was president), former President Bill Clinton, Chris Tucker, Kevin Spacey, George Mitchell, violinist Itzhak Perlman, and astronaut John Glenn.

The pilot explained that he met the celebrities over the course of decades while flying Epstein’s Boeing 727 Gulfstream jet — often referred to in media as the “Lolita Express” — as well as helicopters.

“I certainly remember President Trump, but not many people associated with him,” the pilot said during cross-examination by Maxwell’s defense team, adding that the future head of state flew on the plane before he became president in 2016.

Clinton was mentioned as Visoski testified about a meeting with a female singer in the cockpit of the jet before flying off from an airport in Palm Beach, Florida. Visoski claims that he remembered the singer, identified as Jane Doe in the courtroom, by her “piercing blue eyes” and that she didn’t appear to be young at the time.

“You’ll forgive the question, Mr. Visoski, but I think you’ll remember that at the time you saw her, you also remembered she had large breasts. Isn’t that right?” asked Assistant U.S. Attorney Maureen Comey.

“Uh. She was a mature woman,” Visoski answered in response.

According to prosecutors, Jane was 14 years old when she was essentially “recruited” by Maxwell in 1994, not long before Visoski met her in the cockpit.

“I can’t visualize her sitting in the passenger compartment like I would, say, President Clinton. It was so long ago,” the pilot said.

“Jane Doe” also testified on Tuesday and explained how she was eating ice cream at a youth summer camp when Maxwell and Epstein approached her in a friendly manner.

Before long, however, Maxwell allegedly began training her on how to “massage” Epstein.

Eventually, she explained, she took part in orgies involving both Maxwell and Esptein at the late financier’s massive homes in Palm Beach, New York City, and New Mexico.

Prosecutors have depicted Maxwell as the mastermind of a sadistic sex trafficking gang that preyed on young women and underage girls. The U.S. government has alleged that over the span of at least 10 years, from 1994 to 2004, she “assisted, facilitated, and contributed to Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse of minor girls by, among other things, helping Epstein to recruit, groom, and ultimately abuse” the girls and young women.

The British media heiress has pleaded not guilty to the six felony counts.

Epstein, 66, died of apparent suicide during his incarceration at a federal prison in Manhattan while facing a likely prison sentence of up to 45 years on charges of pedophilia and sex trafficking.

According to Visoski, from 1991 until 2019, he regularly flew Epstein to his private island in the Caribbean, Little St. James – an island popularly referred to as “Pedophile Island.”

“Every week to every 10 days if we weren’t elsewhere in the world, but, you know, it was a regular destination,” Visoski said.

Visoski also noted that he remembered Maxwell, a one-time girlfriend of Epstein, as an employee of the late sex criminal – albeit one whose specific role was unclear.

Typos, corrections and/or news tips? Email us at [email protected]

Continue Reading

Corruption

Ghislaine Maxwell trial begins as Epstein’s shadow looms large

Published

on

Like this article? Get the latest from The Mind Unleashed in your inbox. Sign up right here.

On Monday, opening arguments began in the widely anticipated federal trial of accused sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell, the notorious British socialite who allegedly helped disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein commit a dizzying array of abusive and exploitative acts toward multiple women and girls, including one as young as 14.

Epstein, 66, died of apparent suicide during his incarceration at a federal prison in New York City while facing a potential prison sentence of up to 45 years on charges of pedophilia and sex trafficking.

The Maxwell trial could be a last-ditch opportunity for the government to secure a conviction for the crimes of Epstein, in effect making this the trial that he prevented from ever occurring.

“The shadow of Epstein is going to loom large here,” former federal judge Moira Penza told the New York Times. “The case is obviously going to be about Maxwell, but he’s going to be right at the center of it as well.”

Early Monday, jury selection drew to a close.

The trial won’t be broadcast on television or online, while attendees will be prevented from broadcasting or photographing the trial, reports NPR.

Maxwell, 59, faces charges of grooming multiple minors to engage in illegal sex acts with Epstein, her ex-boyfriend, and sex-trafficking a minor. The indictment accuses the British media heiress of conspiracy, including recruiting one of her partner’s victims to help recruit other girls to be paid to undergo abuse at the hands of Epstein.

On Monday, prosecutors depicted Maxwell, who circulated in wealthy and powerful circles in the U.K. and U.S., as the mastermind of a sadistic sex trafficking gang that preyed on teenage girls. U.S. Attorneys have alleged that over the span of at least 10 years, from 1994 to 2004, she “assisted, facilitated, and contributed to Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse of minor girls by, among other things, helping Epstein to recruit, groom, and ultimately abuse” the girls and young women.

Maxwell has pleaded not guilty to the charges, while her multiple attempts to be released from the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, New York, have all been shot down.

Prosecutor Laura Pomerantz said Monday that Maxwell was a key component in Epstein’s “pyramid scheme of abuse” and criminal sex acts carried out under the color of respectability, reports BBC.

Pomerantz noted that one accuser befriended by the pair was promised bright opportunities in the future.

Prosecutors will call on witnesses including four alleged victims and experts on sexual abuse and those who can inform the jury about the credibility of the couple’s victims, including those who may not have been aware that they suffered abuse at the time.

Experts say that the prosecution will have their work cut out for them and must refrain from making the trial center too much on Epstein’s crimes rather than those of his alleged co-conspirator Maxwell.

Maxwell’s defense will also have to convince the 12-person jury that she was an unwitting player in Epstein’s game, likely by delving into the details of the deceased criminal’s dealings at the top levels of philanthropy, academia, politics, and high finance.

On Monday, the defense protested Maxwell being held liable for Epstein’s crimes and depicted her situation as being one where “memory, manipulation and money” play crucial roles.

However, federal attorneys have pushed back at the idea that she was a victim of Epstein, as opposed to a willing accomplice.

“The government’s yearslong investigation has not developed any evidence that the defendant was victimized in any way by Jeffrey Epstein,” read court papers that were recently filed by the government.

Prosecutors are expected to draw on Maxwell’s so-called “black book,” which meticulously recorded the friends and contacts of Epstein. The FBI gained possession of the book in 2019 when Epstein’s former butler tried to sell it. The government is confident that the book contains “compelling evidence of her guilt,” according to court filings.

Typos, corrections and/or news tips? Email us at [email protected]

Continue Reading

Trending

The Mind Unleashed