At just 13 years old, Tim has already lived a lifetime of uncertainty. Shuffled between foster homes for most of his childhood, he’s grown used to packing his belongings into a small bag, never staying long enough to call anywhere “home.” But behind his quiet demeanor lies a hope as unshakable as it is simple: Tim dreams of being someone’s son.

For many children, having a family is an assumed constant—an invisible anchor that offers love, security, and a sense of belonging. But for Tim, who has spent years navigating the instability of the foster care system, the idea of being part of a family feels like a distant dream. His story is not just his own—it’s a poignant reminder of the thousands of children in foster care who share the same wish for stability and love.

The Reality of Foster Care: A System Stretched Thin

The foster care system was designed to provide safety and support for children who, for various reasons, cannot stay with their biological families. But in practice, the system is often overwhelmed and under-resourced. With more than 400,000 children in foster care across the United States, the demand far exceeds the available resources, leaving many children stuck in temporary arrangements that lack the emotional stability they desperately need.

For children like Tim, these temporary arrangements can feel like a revolving door. Moving from one home to the next creates a sense of instability that makes it difficult to form lasting bonds. Caseworkers, though well-meaning, are often juggling overwhelming caseloads, which means individualized attention is rare. As a result, children in foster care can feel like numbers in a system rather than individuals with unique needs and dreams.

The psychological impact is profound. Studies show that children who grow up in foster care are at higher risk for mental health challenges, such as anxiety and depression, as well as academic difficulties and struggles with self-esteem. Without the steady foundation of a permanent home, many children face an uphill battle to build a sense of identity and security. Tim’s story is just one example of how these systemic shortcomings can leave children feeling invisible and yearning for something more.

Tim’s Journey: A Life Without Roots

Tim’s life in foster care has been a series of transitions—new faces, unfamiliar rooms, and the lingering uncertainty of what comes next. Since entering the system as a young boy, he has moved from one foster home to another, carrying his belongings in a bag and bracing himself for the emotional toll of starting over yet again. For Tim, the concept of “home” is something he’s yet to experience, and the idea of permanence feels like a far-off dream.

Each move has left its mark. Tim has learned to adapt quickly to new environments, but this adaptability comes at a cost. Forming deep connections is difficult when you’re constantly preparing for the next upheaval. The lack of stability has created a void—an emotional absence that no temporary placement can fill. Tim has shared how birthdays and holidays, moments that should be filled with joy and family, often pass by like any other day, a stark reminder of what he’s missing.

Yet, despite the challenges, Tim remains hopeful. He dreams of a home where he can finally unpack for good—a place where he can hang up his coat, mark his height on the wall, and hear someone say, “I’m proud of you, son.” For Tim, it’s not about material comfort; it’s about belonging. He longs for the small moments most people take for granted: sitting down for a family dinner, cheering from the sidelines at a soccer game, or having someone to turn to when life gets tough.

Tim’s resilience is a testament to the strength that many children in foster care develop out of necessity. But his story also highlights the immense emotional toll of growing up without roots. While he’s learned to endure the instability, he’s never stopped wishing for a chance to experience the love and support that only a family can provide. His journey underscores a harsh reality for older children in the system—each passing year makes adoption less likely, and yet the need for connection becomes all the more urgent.

For Tim, the clock is ticking. At 13, he’s entering a critical time when the window for adoption begins to narrow even further. But in his heart, he believes there’s a family out there—a place where he can finally stop running, stop waiting, and simply be a son.

What He Wants: A Chance to Belong

For Tim, the idea of being someone’s son is not about grand gestures or extravagant dreams—it’s about the simple, everyday moments that make a house feel like a home. He yearns for a sense of belonging, a place where he can wake up each morning knowing that he’s loved and wanted, not as a guest or a temporary ward, but as a permanent member of a family.

When Tim talks about his dreams, they’re filled with the kinds of experiences most of us might take for granted. He imagines sitting at the dinner table, sharing stories about his day with people who genuinely care. He dreams of hearing the words “goodnight” before he falls asleep and waking up to the sounds of a bustling household. For Tim, these small, ordinary moments are what define a family—the steady presence of love and support that transforms a house into a home.

What’s particularly moving about Tim’s wish is how deeply he values the concept of being a son. To him, it’s not just a label; it’s an identity. He doesn’t just want a family to live with; he wants to be part of a family, to have a place in the story they write together. Tim envisions learning from a parent, whether it’s how to ride a bike or simply how to navigate the ups and downs of life. He wants to be cheered on during his victories and comforted during his defeats. These are the moments that build a child’s sense of self-worth, and for Tim, they represent a future filled with hope and possibility.

Yet, as hopeful as Tim remains, he understands the obstacles. He knows that older children in foster care often face more challenges when it comes to finding adoptive families. Many potential parents are looking to adopt younger children, leaving teens like Tim to wait even longer. But Tim is undeterred. His unwavering belief that a family is out there for him is a testament to his resilience and his faith in the possibility of love. For Tim, being someone’s son isn’t just a dream—it’s his deepest wish, and he holds onto it with a strength that inspires everyone who hears his story.

The Broader Picture: Children Waiting for Homes

Tim’s story is deeply personal, but it’s also representative of a much larger issue. Across the United States, over 100,000 children in foster care are currently waiting to be adopted. While the foster system provides temporary care, it often struggles to deliver the permanence and stability that children like Tim desperately need. For older kids and teens, the odds of finding a forever family diminish with each passing year.

Statistics reveal a stark reality: children over the age of 8 are significantly less likely to be adopted than younger children. By the time they reach their teens, many kids in foster care face the grim possibility of aging out of the system without ever being placed in a permanent home. For these children, life without a family can be an uphill battle. They’re more likely to face challenges such as homelessness, unemployment, and mental health struggles compared to their peers who are adopted or grow up in stable family environments.

Experts in child development emphasize the importance of a stable home life for fostering emotional and social growth. According to Dr. Sherrie Bourg Carter, a psychologist specializing in childhood trauma, “The love and support of a family can help a child heal from the scars of instability and uncertainty. It’s not just about providing shelter—it’s about creating a foundation for a thriving future.” For children like Tim, the absence of that foundation can make it difficult to form healthy relationships and establish a strong sense of self.

Programs and advocacy groups are working tirelessly to change this narrative. Organizations like AdoptUSKids and local adoption agencies aim to match children with families who are open to adopting older kids and teens. Campaigns like “Wednesday’s Child,” which highlights children waiting for adoption, also play a crucial role in bringing attention to kids like Tim. These efforts are making a difference, but there’s still much work to be done to ensure that every child has a chance to experience the love and stability they deserve.

Tim’s story reminds us that behind every statistic is a child with a unique set of dreams, fears, and hopes for the future. It’s a call to action—not just for prospective adoptive parents, but for communities as a whole—to support programs and policies that give children in foster care the best chance at finding their forever families.

Something strange is stirring in America’s northern plains. Farmers, wildlife experts, and even ecologists are sounding the alarm about an unexpected invader: super pigs. These aren’t your typical barnyard animals or garden-variety feral hogs. They’re smarter, tougher, and spreading faster than anyone anticipated.

Originating in Canada, these hybrid creatures are moving southward, leaving destruction in their wake. They’ve adapted to survive harsh winters, evade capture, and disrupt the delicate balance of ecosystems. What’s driving their unstoppable spread, and why are they so difficult to control? The answers could change how we approach invasive species—and protect the landscapes they’re tearing through.

The Rise of ‘Super Pigs’: From Farming Experiment to Ecological Crisis

What started as a practical solution in Canada’s farming industry has spiraled into an ecological nightmare. Back in the 1980s, farmers bred domestic pigs with Eurasian wild boars to create hardy hybrids capable of surviving harsh winters and increasing meat production. On paper, it seemed like a win-win—tougher animals and higher yields. But when the demand for wild boar meat plummeted, the story took a dark turn.

Left with few options, some farmers released these resilient hybrids into the wild. What followed was a perfect storm: animals designed to thrive in challenging conditions adapting, reproducing, and spreading across Canada’s provinces. These “super pigs” didn’t just survive—they thrived, thanks to their intelligence and ability to evade traditional control methods.

Now, they’re pushing toward the northern United States, creating new challenges for wildlife managers and farmers. The unintended consequences of this farming experiment highlight a harsh truth: innovations, no matter how promising, can spiral out of control when the balance of nature is disrupted.

Why Super Pigs Are Hard to Stop

Super pigs have turned out to be a nightmare for ecologists and farmers alike, defying expectations at every turn. Their ability to thrive in extreme cold has left experts baffled. “That they can survive in such a cold climate is one of the big surprises of this issue,” says Ryan Brook, leader of the University of Saskatchewan’s Canadian Wild Pig Research Project. While most animals would struggle in frigid conditions, these hybrids dig through snow for food and use their wits to outlast even the harshest winters. It’s not just resilience—it’s survival with style.

But their cold-weather grit is only part of the story. Super pigs are ecological bulldozers. They’ll eat just about anything, from crops to wildlife. “Wild hogs feed on anything,” Brook explains. “They gobble up tons and tons of goslings and ducklings in the spring. They can take down a whitetail deer, even an adult.” That voracious appetite puts native species like deer, elk, and waterfowl in serious danger, as they’re outcompeted or outright preyed upon. What started as a novelty—something hunters once celebrated—has become an ecological disaster. As Brook bluntly puts it, “The downsides outweigh any benefit wild hogs may have as a huntable species.”

Adding to the challenge is their adaptability. These animals aren’t just hardy—they’re smart. They’ve learned to evade hunters, avoid traps, and exploit any resource available. For wildlife managers, it’s a constant game of catch-up. Containing their spread and minimizing the damage will require urgent, large-scale collaboration, but with their growing numbers and unmatched resilience, it’s an uphill battle that shows no signs of easing.

Super Pigs and Their Devastating Impact on Ecosystems

It’s hard to overstate just how much damage super pigs are causing. These voracious animals don’t just snack on the occasional plant or small animal—they devour everything in sight. “Wild hogs feed on anything,” says Ryan Brook, leader of the Canadian Wild Pig Research Project. “They gobble up tons and tons of goslings and ducklings in the spring. They can take down a whitetail deer, even an adult.” Let that sink in for a moment. These pigs aren’t just nibbling at the edges of the ecosystem—they’re bulldozing through it, disrupting food chains and endangering species that are already struggling to survive.

But it’s not just what they eat; it’s how they behave. Super pigs are notorious for their rooting habits, digging up soil like nature’s wrecking balls. This isn’t just bad news for native plants—they’re literally tearing apart habitats. Imagine a field left looking like a plowed construction site, except there’s no rebuilding plan. The consequences? Accelerated erosion, invasive species taking over, and ecosystems struggling to stay intact. And let’s not forget the farmers who wake up to find their cornfields and soybean crops destroyed overnight—because yes, super pigs aren’t picky about where they cause chaos.

And then there’s the disease factor. These animals aren’t just carriers of destruction—they also spread illness. One of the biggest fears is African swine fever, a highly contagious disease that could devastate livestock and disrupt the meat industry. Even humans and wildlife are at risk. All of this adds up to a massive environmental and economic problem, one that can’t be ignored. It’s a reminder that when invasive species run wild, the damage spreads far and wide—and we all end up paying the price.

Combating the Super Pig Invasion

Dealing with super pigs isn’t as simple as grabbing a trap and hoping for the best. These animals are clever, resilient, and spread fast, so tackling the problem demands a mix of traditional methods, cutting-edge strategies, and community involvement. One of the most effective approaches so far has been large-scale trapping. Corral traps baited to attract entire groups of pigs—known as sounders—can significantly reduce populations when used correctly.

For a more surgical approach, wildlife managers are turning to the “Judas pig” technique. As Ryan Brook, head of the Canadian Wild Pig Research Project, explains, this method involves collaring a single pig and tracking it back to its companions. “The idea is that you go and find that collared animal, remove any pigs that are with it, and in an ideal world, let it go again—it will just continue to find more and more pigs.” It’s a clever tactic that capitalizes on the pigs’ natural social behavior.

In areas with open terrain, aerial hunting using helicopters offers a rapid way to target large groups of pigs across vast areas. But it’s not just up to the professionals. Public participation is a key piece of the puzzle. Campaigns like “Squeal on Pigs” encourage locals to report sightings, giving wildlife managers the intel they need to act quickly. Regulations have also been put in place to crack down on the release and transport of live pigs, with penalties aimed at deterring illegal activity.

Combating the super pig invasion requires all hands on deck. From innovative methods like Judas pigs to community-driven initiatives, the goal is clear: stop these invaders before their impact becomes irreversible. With coordinated action, there’s still hope to protect ecosystems, farms, and communities from further damage.

Minnesota’s Fight Against Feral Swine

Minnesota has positioned itself as a key player in the battle against feral swine, taking proactive steps to keep these invasive animals at bay. While the state has been officially declared free of feral swine since the USDA eradicated a small group in 2016, the threat is far from over. “No truly wild pigs have entered the state,” says Gary Nohrenberg, Minnesota’s director of Wildlife Services. Still, officials are maintaining a watchful eye, knowing how quickly populations can spiral out of control if even a few pigs slip through the cracks.

To stay ahead, Minnesota’s Department of Natural Resources is preparing a comprehensive report aimed at identifying weak points in its current management strategies. This will guide new preventive measures to ensure feral swine don’t establish a foothold. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) is also stepping up its game, deploying aircraft and drones to monitor activity along the northern border—a critical line of defense against potential incursions.

Minnesota’s efforts are part of a larger, nationwide struggle. The USDA estimates there are now 6 million feral swine across 35 states, wreaking havoc on agriculture and ecosystems alike. While states like Vermont and Washington, with smaller populations, have made strides in eradication, heavily impacted areas like Texas face a tougher battle. “I think we’re making great strides toward success,” says Mike Marlow, assistant director of the National Feral Swine Management Program, “but eradication is not in the near future.”

Despite the challenges, Minnesota’s collaborative approach—paired with federal resources—offers hope. By combining vigilance, innovative surveillance, and strategic planning, the state is setting an example for how to prevent a small problem from becoming a national crisis.

A Growing Threat That Demands Urgent Action

The rise of super pigs in North America is a cautionary tale of unintended consequences. What began as an agricultural experiment has morphed into an ecological and economic crisis, with these resilient invaders leaving a path of destruction in their wake. From disrupting ecosystems and threatening native wildlife to destroying crops and spreading disease, the impact of super pigs is as varied as it is devastating.

The fight against this invasive species requires a united front. Innovative strategies like the Judas pig technique, aerial hunting, and large-scale trapping have shown promise, but these measures alone are not enough. States like Minnesota are leading by example, demonstrating how vigilance, strategic planning, and community involvement can slow the spread. Yet, as experts have noted, eradication remains a distant goal.

If there’s one lesson to take from the super pig crisis, it’s this: when nature is thrown out of balance, the consequences can ripple far and wide. Stopping super pigs will require sustained effort, bold innovation, and the commitment of everyone impacted—before the damage becomes irreversible.

Kelly Clarkson is no stranger to being in the spotlight, but not all attention has been for her music or talk show hosting. A comment she made during a 2018 radio interview about spanking her children has resurfaced, stirring up strong reactions online. In the interview, the Grammy-winning singer admitted to using spanking as a form of discipline, which has sparked a heated debate about parenting practices.

Now, with Clarkson back in the public eye due to her upcoming album and continued reflections on life as a single mother, this old admission has reignited conversations on social media, leaving fans divided over her approach to parenting.

Clarkson’s Approach to Discipline

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Kelly Clarkson (@kellyclarkson)

In her 2018 interview with Atlanta’s 94.1 radio station, Kelly Clarkson spoke openly about her parenting style, admitting she’s “not above a spanking” when it comes to disciplining her children, River Rose and Remington Alexander. She clarified that her approach is measured and purposeful, emphasizing, “I don’t mean hitting hard, just a spanking.”

Clarkson explained that her own upbringing shaped her views on discipline. “My parents spanked me, and I did fine in life,” she shared, pointing out that she sees nothing inherently wrong with this method when done responsibly. She also revealed that spanking isn’t her first course of action. “I always warn them first,” Clarkson said. “I tell them, ‘If you don’t stop, this is going to happen.’ And honestly, it’s worked—they don’t repeat that behavior often.”

However, she acknowledged that public perception of spanking has changed. Clarkson admitted that disciplining her kids in public is “tricky” because of societal judgment. “People think it’s wrong,” she said, but maintained her belief that it’s an effective parenting tool when applied appropriately.

Social Media and Public Backlash

When Clarkson’s comments resurfaced on social media, they sparked a wave of backlash and reignited debates over spanking as a parenting practice. Critics took to Twitter and other platforms, labeling spanking as outdated and harmful. One user described it as “abuse, full stop,” while another questioned how Clarkson’s parenting approach aligns with the emotional themes in her music. “How can you write songs like ‘Because of You’ and ‘Piece by Piece’ and still think spanking your kids is okay?” one commenter wrote.

While much of the online discussion has been critical, Clarkson also garnered support from some fans who appreciated her honesty. Supporters argued that she was simply sharing her personal experience and parenting style, which many found relatable. Still, the controversy underscored how divisive the topic of physical discipline remains, with opinions sharply split between those who see spanking as a legitimate tool and those who condemn it as harmful.

The Larger Context of Clarkson’s Parenting Challenges

Beyond the spanking debate, Kelly Clarkson has been open about the challenges of balancing parenthood with her career and personal life. Following her divorce from Brandon Blackstock, she has frequently discussed the emotional impact of the split on her two children. In a recent podcast interview, Clarkson revealed that she prioritizes open communication with her kids, even when the conversations are tough.

“I ask them every night, ‘Are you happy? And if not, what could make you happier?’” she shared. Clarkson noted that her children, River and Remington, have been candid about their feelings, often expressing sadness over their parents living in separate homes. While these moments are painful to hear, she values their honesty.

Clarkson’s approach reflects her belief in acknowledging her children’s emotions without dismissing them. “They’re not small feelings; those are huge emotions,” she said. Drawing from her own experience as a child of divorced parents, she reassures them that they are deeply loved and that the family will navigate these changes together.

The Bigger Debate Around Spanking

Kelly Clarkson’s comments have stirred up one of the oldest debates in parenting: Is spanking ever okay? For some, it’s seen as a straightforward way to teach boundaries and discipline. Others argue it does more harm than good, with studies suggesting it might lead to increased aggression or emotional struggles for kids.

Clarkson’s perspective reflects how personal these decisions can be. She grew up with spanking and feels it worked for her, but critics see it differently. Many believe there are better ways to guide children, like time-outs or positive reinforcement, that don’t involve physical punishment.

At the heart of the debate is a big question: How do parents find what works best for their family without judgment? Clarkson’s story shows just how complicated—and emotional—these choices can be.

Alternatives to Spanking: Positive Ways to Guide Your Kids

The debate over spanking has many parents wondering: Are there better ways to teach kids responsibility and self-control? The good news is, there are plenty of non-physical approaches that can help guide children’s behavior while fostering a more positive parent-child relationship.

• Positive reinforcement: Kids thrive on encouragement, and positive reinforcement is all about focusing on what they’re doing right. A simple compliment like, “I love how you shared your toys,” can go a long way. Praising good behavior not only boosts their confidence but also motivates them to keep it up. Small rewards—like a sticker chart for completed chores—can also make good behavior feel exciting and worthwhile.

• Time-outs that work: Sometimes kids need a moment to step back and cool off, and that’s where time-outs come in. The key is using them thoughtfully—give your child a quiet space to reflect on their actions without making it feel like a punishment. For younger kids, one minute per year of age is a good rule of thumb. The goal isn’t just to stop bad behavior but to give them a chance to reset.

• Logical consequences: Letting kids experience the natural results of their choices can teach powerful lessons. For instance, if your child refuses to wear a coat on a cold day, they’ll feel the chill and understand why it’s important. These kinds of consequences help kids connect their actions to real-world outcomes without needing punishment from you.

• Be Clear about boundaries: Kids do best when they know what’s expected of them. Set simple, clear rules and stick to them. For example, if you say, “No screen time until homework is done,” follow through every time. Consistency gives kids a sense of security and helps prevent confusion about the rules.

• Lead by example: Kids are little sponges—they’re always watching and learning from you. If you handle stress calmly or show kindness to others, they’re more likely to mimic those behaviors. By showing them how to navigate tricky situations with patience and respect, you’re teaching them lifelong skills for managing their emotions and relationships.

These approaches don’t just avoid the controversies of physical discipline—they also create a nurturing environment where kids can learn, grow, and thrive.

Parenting in the Spotlight

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Kelly Clarkson (@kellyclarkson)

Kelly Clarkson’s admission about spanking her children has brought a deeply personal parenting choice into public view, sparking debates that go far beyond her individual experience. While her honesty has resonated with some, it’s also reignited conversations about how parenting methods evolve and how society views physical discipline today.

Parenting is rarely a one-size-fits-all journey, and Clarkson’s story highlights the complexities of raising children in a world where every decision is scrutinized. Whether you agree with her approach or not, it’s clear that Clarkson is navigating parenthood with openness and a willingness to learn—qualities that many parents can relate to, even if their methods differ.

In today’s fast-paced world of technological breakthroughs and cutting-edge pharmaceuticals, something remarkable is happening: people are looking back to ancient traditions for answers. Practices like acupuncture, Ayurveda, and herbal medicine—once sidelined as “alternative” treatments—are gaining a new wave of respect in modern healthcare.

What’s driving this change? It’s a combination of factors: rising chronic health issues, growing interest in holistic care, and mounting scientific evidence that validates the benefits of these time-tested approaches. For many, these practices offer what conventional medicine sometimes lacks—a focus on prevention, balance, and the whole person. As healthcare systems worldwide embrace a more integrative approach, acupuncture, Ayurveda, and herbal remedies are becoming key players in shaping a future that merges ancient wisdom with modern science.

Rediscovering Ancient Wisdom: How Traditional Healing Practices Are Shaping Modern Medicine

In a world driven by technological advancements and pharmaceutical breakthroughs, a subtle shift is taking place: the revival of ancient healing practices. These age-old traditions, rooted in centuries of cultural wisdom, are capturing the attention of modern healthcare for their holistic approach to wellness. From the balance-centered practices of Ayurveda and Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) to the plant-based remedies found in herbal medicine, ancient healing systems are being revisited as people seek natural ways to manage health and wellbeing.

This renewed interest isn’t just about nostalgia or alternative treatments; it’s about a profound recognition of the benefits these practices offer. As conventional medicine grapples with rising chronic health issues and mental health challenges, many are turning to traditional methods to complement and enhance their healthcare. In this journey into the world of ancient wisdom, we’ll explore how these practices are making a comeback, blending seamlessly with modern science to create a more balanced, holistic view of health.

Acupuncture: An Ancient Fix That’s Winning Modern Hearts

Acupuncture has been around for thousands of years, but it’s not just some old-school remedy stuck in the past. This Traditional Chinese Medicine practice works on the idea that your body’s energy, called Qi (pronounced “chee”), flows through invisible pathways. When something throws that flow out of balance, you start feeling the effects—like pain, stress, or other health issues. Acupuncture uses tiny needles to help get that energy back on track.

What’s cool is how it’s gone from being an ancient tradition to something you can now find in modern hospitals and clinics. It’s not just about needles anymore; science is backing it up. Researchers have found that acupuncture helps release endorphins, your body’s natural painkillers, and can calm an overworked nervous system. That’s why it’s showing up as a treatment option for chronic pain, migraines, and even anxiety.

People are turning to acupuncture because it doesn’t just treat the symptoms—it helps your body reset itself. Whether you’re dealing with a stiff back or looking for some stress relief, it’s proof that old practices can fit perfectly into today’s world of healthcare.

Ayurveda: Ancient Healing That Feels Tailored Just for You

Ayurveda has been around for thousands of years, and it’s all about keeping things balanced. This system of medicine, which started in India, doesn’t treat everyone the same way. Instead, it focuses on your unique energy, or “doshas”—Vata, Pitta, and Kapha. When these are out of whack, that’s when you start feeling off, whether it’s stress, poor digestion, or low energy.

What’s amazing is how Ayurveda’s focus on personalized care is starting to click with modern healthcare. For instance, turmeric, one of Ayurveda’s go-to remedies, is getting a lot of attention. Science has found that curcumin, the compound that gives turmeric its golden color, can help with inflammation and joint pain. Then there’s ashwagandha, an herb known for easing stress and boosting energy, which is now a favorite in wellness circles.

The reason Ayurveda is making such a strong comeback is simple—it’s not just about fixing problems after they show up. It’s about creating a lifestyle that helps you stay balanced and healthy in the first place. More doctors and wellness programs are starting to include Ayurvedic practices because they tap into something we all need: a little harmony in our busy lives.

Herbal Remedies: Why We’re Turning Back to Nature

It’s no secret that plants have been our go-to healers for centuries, but lately, they’re making a serious comeback. Herbs like turmeric, chamomile, and ginkgo biloba are proving that nature might just have some of the answers we’ve been looking for all along.

Let’s talk about turmeric. Sure, you’ve probably seen it in trendy lattes or recipes, but it’s been a staple in Ayurveda for generations. Why? Because it works. Science is now catching up, showing that curcumin—the magic ingredient in turmeric—can help with inflammation and even joint pain. And then there’s ginkgo biloba, often called a “brain booster.” Traditional Chinese Medicine has relied on it for years to help with memory and circulation, and now studies suggest it could even help with age-related memory loss.

What makes herbal remedies so appealing today? They’re natural, they’re gentle, and they don’t come with a laundry list of side effects. Plus, in a world that’s all about going green, these plant-based solutions fit right in. Whether it’s a calming cup of chamomile tea or a turmeric capsule, these remedies remind us that nature’s been on our side all along.

Bridging Ancient Wisdom with Modern Science

It’s pretty incredible how ancient practices like acupuncture, Ayurveda, and herbal remedies are finding their way into modern healthcare. What’s making this happen? Science is stepping in and confirming what people have believed for centuries—these methods actually work.

Take acupuncture, for example. It’s not just about pain relief anymore. Studies have shown that it can trigger your body to release endorphins (those feel-good hormones) and calm your nervous system. That’s why you’ll now find it being used for everything from migraines to anxiety, and even fertility treatments. Ayurveda is getting its moment too. Ingredients like turmeric and ashwagandha, staples in Ayurvedic medicine, are now backed by research showing they can help with inflammation and stress.

What’s cool is how science and tradition are teaming up. Researchers are digging into how these remedies work on a deeper level, while doctors and wellness experts are starting to embrace them as real options for their patients. It’s like the best of both worlds—ancient wisdom and modern science coming together to offer us more ways to stay healthy.

Why Modern Healthcare Is Embracing Ancient Practices

It’s no coincidence that practices like acupuncture, Ayurveda, and herbal remedies are showing up more in hospitals and wellness clinics. The healthcare world is shifting, and people are looking for options that feel more personal and less about just treating symptoms. These ancient methods bring something modern medicine often misses—a focus on the whole person.

One big reason for this shift is the rise in chronic conditions like stress, anxiety, and pain. Traditional approaches, like acupuncture or turmeric supplements, don’t just address the surface problem; they often get to the root of what’s going on. Plus, there’s a growing pile of research showing these methods actually work, which helps bridge the trust gap between ancient practices and modern science.

Another driver? People are getting tired of treatments that come with long lists of side effects. Herbal remedies and therapies like acupuncture offer a gentler, often more sustainable option. This is especially appealing in a world that’s becoming more eco-conscious and wellness-focused. It’s clear that ancient practices are no longer “alternative”—they’re becoming an essential part of how we approach healthcare today.

Honoring the Past, Healing the Future

Ancient healing practices aren’t just making a comeback—they’re reshaping how we look at health. Acupuncture, Ayurveda, and herbal remedies remind us that healthcare can be about more than quick fixes. They focus on treating the whole person, something many people feel is missing from modern medicine.

What’s even better? Science is catching up and giving these practices the credit they deserve. Research shows acupuncture can ease pain, while turmeric is proving to be a powerful anti-inflammatory. This combination of tradition and science is changing the game, offering a more balanced way to care for ourselves.

These practices also bring a deeper message: health isn’t just about fixing what’s broken. It’s about finding balance and feeling good from the inside out. Whether it’s an acupuncture session, a soothing herbal tea, or an Ayurvedic routine, these timeless methods are teaching us how to truly care for our minds and bodies in a way that lasts.

References:

• Bower, J. E., Irwin, M. R., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. (2016). Mind-body therapies and control of inflammatory biology: A descriptive review. Brain, behaviour, and immunity, pp. 51, 1–11.
• Sharma, R. A., Gescher, A. J., & Steward, W. P. (2018). Curcumin: The story so far. European Journal of Cancer, 54, 209–229.
• Vickers, A. J., Cronin, A. M., Maschino, A. C., Lewith, G., MacPherson, H., Foster, N. E., … & Acupuncture Trialists’ Collaboration. (2012). Acupuncture for chronic pain: Individual patient data meta-analysis. Archives of Internal Medicine, 172(19), 1444–1453.

Climate change is one of the most pressing issues of our time, yet the mainstream media continues to stumble in its coverage, leaving the public inadequately informed. At a time when every day brings news of intensifying natural disasters, rising temperatures, and shifting ecosystems, the role of media in shaping our understanding—and urgency—around climate action is vital. Yet, the reality is that many media outlets still aren’t giving this issue the spotlight it deserves.

While some publications have increased their climate coverage, they often fail to convey the scope of the crisis or the solutions that could help mitigate it. From downplaying the severity to avoiding uncomfortable truths about root causes, media coverage has often missed the mark.

Downplaying the Crisis—Language and Framing Tactics

The way the media talks about climate change can have a huge impact on how we feel about it—and whether we feel like it’s something we need to act on. Words matter. For example, calling it a “climate crisis” gives off a sense of emergency. But saying “climate change”? It sounds almost gentle, like it’s just a shift in weather, nothing we need to worry about. This kind of language can make it easy for people to think it’s not a real, immediate threat.

Then there’s the way stories are framed. We often see headlines like “unexpected weather” or “unusual events” without any link to long-term climate trends. Headlines like these don’t tell us that these events are part of a bigger, ongoing problem. Or take the term “natural disaster”—it sounds random, right? But many of these disasters, like wildfires or floods, are now happening more frequently because of human-driven climate factors. If the media doesn’t make that connection clear, it’s easy for people to think these are isolated incidents, rather than seeing them as part of the bigger picture of climate change.

And this kind of language doesn’t just shape how we think; it affects how we act. When the media uses softer, vague words to describe what’s happening, it makes the crisis feel distant, even unimportant. If the news made it clear that these are urgent problems tied directly to climate change, people might feel a lot more inclined to push for action. The media has a huge influence here—they can help people understand that this is a serious, immediate crisis. All it takes is clearer, more straightforward language that doesn’t downplay the stakes.

False Balance and the Myth of “Both Sides” in Climate Reporting

One big way that climate reporting often goes wrong is by trying to give “both sides” of the issue equal airtime, even when there really aren’t two valid sides. You’ve probably seen this before: a climate scientist, someone who’s dedicated years to studying the crisis, is paired with a climate skeptic, as if their opinions are equally credible. But here’s the thing—more than 99% of scientists agree that climate change is real and mainly caused by human activities. There’s no real debate among experts.

So why does the media keep presenting it like there is? Giving skeptics the same platform makes it look like the science isn’t settled, like there’s still doubt about what’s causing climate change. But the science is as clear as it can be. This “both sides” approach just confuses people, making them think that climate change is still an open question, which can lead to inaction.

And this confusion has real consequences. Studies show that when people see climate change framed as a “debate,” they’re less likely to trust climate science or feel that urgent action is needed. If the media treated climate science the same way they treat topics like gravity or smoking, we’d probably see a lot more support for climate solutions. Climate reporting doesn’t need to give equal weight to skeptics—it needs to show the reality of what scientists know so people can see the full picture.

Missing Narratives—Underrepresented Voices and Stories

Another big gap in climate reporting is whose stories we actually hear. When we talk about climate change, the voices that often get the spotlight are from big cities or wealthier countries. Meanwhile, the people who are already dealing with the worst effects—communities in the Global South, Indigenous groups, and others on the frontlines—don’t get nearly as much attention. These are the people facing things like rising sea levels, intense droughts, and food shortages right now, but their stories don’t always make it into mainstream media.

This lack of coverage matters. When we don’t hear from people who are directly affected, it’s easy to think of climate change as a future problem or as something happening somewhere far away. But for many communities, climate change is already reshaping their daily lives. Hearing these stories would help everyone understand the crisis as something real and immediate, not just as an abstract idea.

There’s also a big piece missing when it comes to climate activists, especially young activists and those from marginalized communities. These are the people leading movements and pushing for real change, but they’re often sidelined or reduced to quick soundbites. By focusing more on these voices, media could give a fuller picture of both the problem and the solutions being fought for right now.

The Role of Individual Action Narratives and Fossil Fuel Advertising

One thing you’ll notice in a lot of climate coverage is how much it talks about what we, as individuals, should be doing—like recycling, using less plastic, or driving less. Now, those things do help, but when the focus is only on personal actions, it misses a huge part of the picture. Climate change isn’t just about individual choices; it’s mainly driven by a handful of big industries and companies with massive carbon footprints.

This is where fossil fuel companies get pretty crafty. They put out ads that make them look like they’re helping to fight climate change, with messages about renewable energy or planting trees. But the truth is, those “green” projects are often a tiny part of what they actually do. Most of their money is still poured into oil, gas, and coal. These ads make them look like climate heroes, even though they’re some of the biggest contributors to the problem.

So when the media focuses too much on what individuals can do, it can almost feel like a distraction. It makes us think that if we just bring our own bags to the store, we’re doing our part, while the real drivers of climate change keep on doing business as usual. If we’re going to get serious about climate solutions, we need media coverage that puts more pressure on these big polluters, not just on everyday people trying to make a difference with small changes.

Shaping a New Climate Narrative

If we’re serious about tackling climate change, the media has to get serious about how it covers it, too. Right now, a lot of climate coverage is falling flat. We see a focus on small personal actions, or we get stories that make it sound like the science isn’t totally clear—when it actually is. This type of coverage doesn’t just leave people confused; it makes the whole issue feel less urgent than it really is.

The media has a huge role to play in getting people to understand that climate change isn’t some distant, abstract problem—it’s here, and it’s impacting us now. By putting more focus on the big drivers of climate change, lifting up voices from communities on the frontlines, and stopping the fossil fuel ads that just muddy the waters, the media could give us a way clearer view of what’s really going on. People deserve reporting that’s upfront about the stakes, that doesn’t sugarcoat the problem or treat it like it’s just one of many issues we face. When the media is clear, honest, and talks about real solutions, it gives people a sense of direction—and shows that taking action is not only possible but necessary right now.

And hey, we can help push things in the right direction, too. We can support the outlets that take climate coverage seriously, call out misleading stories when we see them, and keep asking for better, more honest reporting. The more we demand transparency, the harder it’ll be for the media to ignore the real story.

Despite all we’ve learned through science, certain mysteries remain stubbornly unsolved, almost as if they’re daring us to uncover them. How can something that makes up most of the universe remain invisible to us? Why do we experience consciousness, that sense of awareness that feels so close yet is so hard to explain? And what will ultimately become of the universe we inhabit? Questions like these remind us that, while we’ve come a long way, there are still vast frontiers waiting to be explored.

In this article, we’ll dive into three of the most intriguing mysteries that science has yet to fully explain: dark matter, consciousness, and the fate of the universe. These puzzles not only push the boundaries of what we know but also challenge us to think beyond the visible and tangible. Each of them stands as a reminder that the unknown can inspire us just as much as what we already understand.

The Elusive Nature of Dark Matter

Imagine something that makes up nearly all of the universe—about 85% of it, to be exact—but we can’t see it, touch it, or directly detect it. That’s dark matter. It’s this invisible “stuff” that scientists know is there because of how it tugs on galaxies and holds everything together. Without it, galaxies would just fall apart. But even though we know it exists, we’re still left scratching our heads about what dark matter actually is.

Scientists have spent years trying to explain this mystery. Some think dark matter is made of particles called WIMPs (Weakly Interacting Massive Particles). These particles are so elusive they just slip through everything else without leaving a trace. Others suggest we might need to rethink gravity itself, especially on the massive scale of the universe, to account for what we’re seeing.

Even with all the advanced technology we have—giant detectors, powerful telescopes—dark matter keeps its secrets. Figuring it out wouldn’t just check a box; it could totally change how we see the universe and even give us clues about what the future holds for everything around us. For now, dark matter is like a cosmic secret, reminding us that we’re still in the early chapters of understanding the universe.

Exploring the Twilight Zone of the Ocean

While space often captures the imagination when it comes to exploration, Earth’s oceans hold mysteries just as profound. One such mystery lies within the ocean’s “twilight zone,” a layer of water between 200 and 1,000 meters below the surface where sunlight fades, creating an environment that is barely explored. This shadowy region is home to countless unknown species, some of which may play crucial roles in maintaining Earth’s climate by cycling carbon and regulating nutrients.

The creatures that dwell in the twilight zone exhibit unique adaptations for survival in an environment with scarce light and food. Some species use bioluminescence to attract prey or confuse predators, creating a mesmerizing light show in the depths of the ocean. Scientists believe that the biomass in this zone may exceed that of all other oceanic layers combined, an ecological treasure that could offer new resources and insights into marine biology. However, studying this zone comes with significant challenges, as the technology needed to operate at such depths is expensive and complex.

The twilight zone presents a range of challenges for researchers. Unlike the surface or deeper ocean zones that have been extensively studied, this region is difficult to access and observe. Recent advancements in remote-controlled submarines and underwater technology have begun to shed light on this mysterious realm, but much remains unknown. Scientists speculate that this layer holds vast fish populations with potential impacts on global fisheries and food security. These ecosystems are delicate and could be affected by overfishing, climate change, and pollution, making the need to understand them even more urgent.

The Rise and Fall of Venus

Our neighboring planet Venus presents another gripping mystery: why did it transform into a fiery wasteland, while Earth flourished with life? Venus and Earth are often called “sister planets” due to their similar size, composition, and distance from the sun. However, where Earth developed conditions suitable for life, Venus turned into an inhospitable inferno with surface temperatures hot enough to melt lead and an atmosphere thick with carbon dioxide.

Theorists have long debated how such a close twin could follow such a divergent path. Some believe that Venus once had oceans and a temperate climate, but that a catastrophic greenhouse effect, potentially triggered by volcanic eruptions, led to its demise. Others suggest that solar winds may have stripped away any early water, preventing the development of an Earth-like environment. These hypotheses fuel a growing interest in studying Venus further, with upcoming missions by NASA and other space agencies aimed at uncovering more of its secrets.

Scientists believe Venus may have once harbored oceans, but something triggered a dramatic climate shift, resulting in its current harsh conditions. Understanding Venus’s transformation could provide insights into the forces that stabilize climates on rocky planets and offer warnings about potential climate scenarios on Earth. As researchers gear up for future missions to Venus, they hope to uncover evidence of its watery past and learn whether Earth’s “sister” ever had conditions similar to ours. Exploring Venus may one day help us protect our planet from a similar fate.

The Unknown Future of Animal Evolution

While much of evolution’s past is mapped through fossils and genetics, predicting the future of evolution is a challenging task. Human activities such as urbanization, pollution, and climate change have dramatically altered the planet’s ecosystems, prompting scientists to wonder: how will animals adapt to these changes over the coming millennia?

Experts predict that future evolutionary adaptations may favor animals that can thrive in human-altered environments. For example, some urban species might evolve smaller body sizes, enabling them to maneuver in confined spaces, or develop nocturnal habits to avoid human disturbances. On a larger scale, marine life may adapt to warmer and more acidic oceans, while land animals may evolve to endure pollution and habitat loss. These speculative projections underscore the resilience of life, but they also serve as reminders of humanity’s profound impact on Earth’s biodiversity.

Biologists propose several possibilities for the future of animal evolution. Some predict that animals will develop traits allowing them to thrive in human-dominated landscapes, such as resilience to pollutants or a reliance on urban food sources. This evolutionary guessing game highlights the resilience of life on Earth, yet it also raises ethical and environmental concerns. How we choose to manage natural habitats and combat climate change today will shape the paths that evolution takes, impacting not only future species but also the balance of Earth’s ecosystems. The future of animal evolution is one of the most dynamic mysteries, pointing to both nature’s adaptability and humanity’s influence on the natural world.

Consciousness: The Mind’s Greatest Mystery

Perhaps the most profound mystery lies within our own minds: the nature of human consciousness. Despite extensive research, scientists and philosophers alike remain puzzled by the origins and mechanisms of consciousness. While we understand some brain functions, such as memory and perception, consciousness itself—the experience of being aware—is still beyond full comprehension.

Some scientists believe that understanding consciousness may require a paradigm shift in how we view the mind and brain. Emerging theories suggest that consciousness might not be confined to human beings but could be a fundamental property of the universe, as essential as gravity or electromagnetism. Meanwhile, advanced neuroimaging tools are enabling researchers to observe brain patterns associated with conscious thought, but these studies have yet to answer why or how subjective experiences arise from physical processes.

Research into consciousness often falls into two camps: physicalist theories that explain consciousness as a product of neural activity, and dualist theories that suggest it may involve non-material elements. Scientists use technologies like fMRI and EEG to map brain activity, revealing patterns associated with awareness. Yet, no theory has definitively answered how these patterns translate into the experience of consciousness. Understanding this enigma could revolutionize fields ranging from artificial intelligence to mental health, shedding light on the mind’s depths and the very essence of what it means to be human. Consciousness remains a frontier of both scientific and philosophical exploration, bridging the tangible with the intangible.

The Universe’s Fate: How Will It End?

The universe had a beginning, so it makes sense to wonder—how’s it all going to end? It’s one of those questions that feels almost impossible to wrap our heads around, but scientists are trying. They’ve come up with a few big theories, each as mind-bending as the last.

One idea is the “Big Freeze.” In this scenario, the universe just keeps expanding, with everything drifting farther and farther apart until, eventually, it all goes cold and dark—no more stars, no more heat, just emptiness. Another possibility is the “Big Crunch,” where, instead of expanding forever, the universe could start pulling back on itself, ending up as one super-dense, hot point again. And then there’s the “Big Rip,” which sounds like the wildest one: if the universe keeps expanding faster and faster, it could eventually tear galaxies, stars, and even atoms apart. Talk about an intense finale.

What makes this tricky is that so much of it depends on dark matter and dark energy, two forces we don’t fully understand. Dark matter holds things together, while dark energy is pushing the universe to expand. Figuring out what these mysterious forces actually are could give us some real clues about where the universe is headed. But until then, we’re left with some pretty epic guesses—and a whole lot of mystery.

Embracing the Unknown: The Quest for Answers

When you think about these big mysteries—dark matter, consciousness, and what might happen to the universe—it’s pretty mind-blowing. There’s so much we still don’t understand! But maybe that’s what makes it all so interesting. These aren’t just questions with easy answers; they’re like doors that open into even bigger questions.

Every time scientists make a discovery, it feels like they’re getting closer, but somehow, new questions pop up. And that’s kind of the beauty of it. Science isn’t always about finding all the answers right away. It’s about exploring, learning, and just being curious about everything we don’t know yet.

So, who knows where this will all lead? Maybe we’ll solve some of these mysteries, or maybe we’ll just keep finding more things to wonder about. Either way, the adventure of figuring it out is what makes it all worth it.

Sources:

1. Deep-sea discovery shines light on life in the twilight zone. (2024, September 24). ScienceDaily. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/09/240925123650.htm#:~:text=The%20ocean’s%20twilight%20zone%20is,growth%20of%20bacteria%20is%20restricted.
2. Paulson, S., Chalmers, D., Kahneman, D., Santos, L., & Schiff, N. (2013). The thinking ape: the enigma of human consciousness. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1303(1), 4–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12165

In today’s digital world, smartphones have transformed from mere gadgets into essential lifelines. They keep us connected, informed, and entertained, serving as our gateway to almost everything—from instant communication and endless information to a virtual space that feels like home. But as these devices nestle deeper into our daily lives, a growing question arises: When does helpful convenience cross into unhealthy attachment?

Phone addiction is more than a buzzword; it’s a reality for millions who find themselves checking their screens constantly, craving notifications, and feeling anxious without their devices. Could the device that connects us to the world be isolating us from it at the same time? In this article, we’ll explore the surprising psychology behind our digital dependency, the signs it may be affecting us, and practical ways to regain balance.

What Is Phone Addiction and Why Does It Happen?

Phone addiction, often referred to as “nomophobia” (the fear of being without a mobile phone), is characterized by excessive and compulsive use of smartphones, leading to significant interference with daily life, relationships, and responsibilities. This behavioral addiction shares similarities with other compulsive behaviors, such as gambling, where individuals experience a loss of control over their actions despite negative consequences.

The underlying mechanism of phone addiction is closely linked to the brain’s reward system, particularly the neurotransmitter dopamine. Dopamine plays a crucial role in motivating behavior by providing pleasurable sensations when we engage in rewarding activities. Smartphone use, especially interactions on social media, triggers the release of dopamine, reinforcing the behavior and creating a cycle of craving and reward. As noted by psychiatrist Anna Lembke, “That’s the hallmark of an addictive drug. It just intrinsically draws people in.”

Research has shown that notifications and social interactions via smartphones activate the brain’s reward pathways, leading to repeated engagement. A study published in the journal Frontiers in Psychiatry highlights that problematic cell-phone use has been associated with personality variables such as extraversion, neuroticism, and impulsivity, as well as psychiatric comorbidities like anxiety and depression.

The design of smartphones and applications also contributes to their addictive potential. Features like infinite scrolling and variable rewards are intentionally implemented to keep users engaged. Tristan Harris, a former Google design ethicist, pointed out that “services like Facebook and YouTube leverage our attention and engagement to sell ads or otherwise attract funding. It’s happening not by accident, but by design.”

Recognizing the Signs of Problematic Phone Use

Recognizing the signs of problematic phone use is essential for understanding and addressing potential addiction. Individuals may experience a range of symptoms, including:

• Preoccupation with the phone: Constantly thinking about or using the device, even during important tasks.
• Anxiety without access: Feeling anxious or disoriented when the phone is not nearby.
• Excessive use: Spending an inordinate amount of time on the phone, often at the expense of other activities.
• Negative emotions upon restriction: Experiencing irritability or distress when phone usage is limited.

These behaviors can lead to significant disruptions in daily life, affecting personal relationships, work, and overall well-being. A study published in BMC Psychiatry found that approximately 23% of children and young people exhibited problematic smartphone use, which was associated with increased odds of depression, anxiety, and poor sleep quality.

Additionally, the phenomenon of “ringxiety”—the false sensation of hearing a phone ring or feeling it vibrate when it hasn’t—has been identified as a symptom of phone addiction.

Impact of Phone Addiction on Daily Life

Excessive smartphone use, often termed “phone addiction,” can significantly disrupt various aspects of daily life. Research indicates that individuals with problematic smartphone use may experience increased social isolation, diminished self-confidence, and heightened levels of depression and anxiety.

A study published in Frontiers in Psychiatry found that problematic smartphone use is negatively associated with young adults’ psychosocial well-being, with time spent using smartphones influencing mental health.

The pervasive nature of smartphones can lead to constant distractions, adversely affecting productivity and concentration. This constant connectivity often results in sleep disturbances, as individuals may find it challenging to disconnect from their devices, leading to poor sleep quality and associated health issues.

Physical health is also at risk; prolonged smartphone use can cause eye strain, headaches, and musculoskeletal problems due to poor posture. Moreover, the overuse of smartphones can interfere with personal relationships, as face-to-face interactions may be neglected in favor of virtual communication, leading to weakened social bonds and increased feelings of loneliness.

In severe cases, phone addiction has been linked to more serious mental health concerns. A longitudinal study published in BMC Public Health found that mobile phone addiction during the COVID-19 quarantine period could directly predict suicidality in adolescents within the subsequent five months, even after controlling for depression and daytime sleepiness.

When to Seek Professional Help

Recognizing when to seek professional help for phone addiction is crucial, especially when self-regulation efforts prove insufficient. If excessive phone use significantly disrupts daily life, relationships, or mental health, consulting a mental health professional is advisable. Therapies such as Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) have shown effectiveness in addressing behavioral addictions, including phone addiction. CBT helps individuals identify and modify negative thought patterns and behaviors associated with excessive phone use.

Additionally, support groups like Internet and Tech Addiction Anonymous offer communal support and shared experiences, which can be beneficial in overcoming phone addiction.

Recognizing the need for professional assistance is a proactive step toward regaining control and fostering a healthier relationship with technology.

Reconnect with Life: Simple Steps to Break Free from Your Phone

Excessive smartphone use can disrupt daily life, affecting productivity, relationships, and mental well-being. To regain control over your phone usage, consider implementing the following strategies:

1. Set Clear Boundaries

Establish specific times and places where phone use is limited or prohibited. For instance, designate the dinner table or bedroom as phone-free zones to encourage face-to-face interactions and improve sleep quality.

2. Monitor and Limit Screen Time

Utilize built-in features or third-party apps to track your screen time. Setting daily limits for app usage can help you become more aware of your habits and reduce unnecessary phone use.

3. Turn Off Non-Essential Notifications

Disable notifications for apps that are not crucial. This reduces distractions and the compulsion to check your phone frequently. By minimizing interruptions, you can focus better on tasks at hand.

4. Engage in Offline Activities

Rediscover hobbies and activities that don’t involve screens, such as reading, exercising, or spending time outdoors. Engaging in offline pursuits can provide fulfillment and reduce the urge to reach for your phone out of boredom.

5. Implement the Pomodoro Technique

Adopt time management methods like the Pomodoro Technique, which involves working for a set period (e.g., 25 minutes) followed by a short break. This structure can help you stay focused and reduce the temptation to check your phone during work sessions.

6. Utilize Digital Well-being Tools

Many smartphones offer features that monitor and limit usage. For example, Apple’s Screen Time and Android’s Digital Wellbeing provide insights into your habits and allow you to set restrictions on app usage.

7. Seek Professional Support if Needed

If self-imposed measures aren’t effective, consider seeking help from a mental health professional. Therapies such as cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) have been shown to assist individuals in managing and overcoming behavioral addictions, including problematic phone use.

Reclaiming Control Over Technology

Breaking free from phone addiction is not merely about cutting down screen time; it’s about reclaiming control over your attention, time, and overall well-being. Recognizing the signs of problematic phone use and understanding its impact on your daily life are crucial steps toward change. By implementing practical strategies—like setting boundaries, engaging in offline activities, and seeking professional help when needed—you can foster a healthier relationship with your smartphone.

Remember, technology is a tool designed to enhance our lives, not control them. By taking conscious steps to manage your phone usage, you’re investing in better mental health, stronger relationships, and a more mindful existence. It’s about finding balance in a digitally connected world and ensuring that you’re present for the moments that truly matter.

In recent years, artificial intelligence has surged beyond its experimental origins, embedding itself in daily operations across industries and changing the way we work in ways we could hardly have imagined a decade ago. Once the stuff of science fiction, AI is now a force powerful enough to redefine tasks, create new opportunities, and even spark concerns about the stability of certain careers. Predictions of AI-driven automation impacting millions of jobs have created a mix of excitement and apprehension, leaving workers and business leaders wondering: What lies ahead in the evolving relationship between AI and the workplace?

From automating repetitive tasks to tackling challenges on a scale beyond human capacity, AI’s role in shaping our future is just beginning to unfold. While some industries have been quick to embrace AI’s potential, others are still finding their footing. But one thing is clear—those who understand how to harness AI’s power effectively may stand to gain the most. In this article, we’ll journey through AI’s transformative impact on the workplace, uncovering the opportunities, challenges, and the steps businesses can take to navigate an AI-driven future.

AI’s Transformative Impact on Industries

Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing industries worldwide, reshaping operations, and redefining roles across various sectors. A 2023 report by Goldman Sachs highlights that AI-driven automation could disrupt up to 300 million jobs globally, with office and administrative support, legal work, and architecture and engineering in the U.S. facing significant risks.

The finance industry leads in AI adoption, utilizing algorithms for real-time data analysis to detect fraud and market fluctuations, thereby transforming risk management.

Manufacturing and technology sectors also exhibit high AI usage among executives, at 80% and 64% respectively, indicating a pronounced impact in these fields. Conversely, construction and finance sectors show lower adoption rates, suggesting untapped potential.

Geographical disparities in AI adoption are evident; for instance, executives in New York City have a higher adoption rate (73%) compared to those in Los Angeles (60%), reflecting regional differences in AI utilization.

AI and Workforce Demographics

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping the workforce, with its adoption influenced by various demographic factors. A study by Hunter Marketing reveals that 61% of male executives utilize AI, compared to 29% of female executives, indicating a significant gender disparity. This gap may stem from differences in accessibility, awareness, or confidence in AI technologies. Addressing this imbalance is crucial for fostering a diverse and inclusive work environment.

Age also plays a pivotal role in AI adoption. Executives aged 25 to 44 exhibit the highest usage rates at 61%, reflecting a greater openness to innovation. In contrast, only 22% of executives aged 65 and above engage with AI tools, possibly due to unfamiliarity or resistance to altering established work routines.

Income levels further influence AI adoption. Executives earning between $100,000 and $199,000 show a 61% adoption rate, while those earning over $200,000 have a lower rate of 53%. This trend suggests that higher earners might delegate AI-related tasks to subordinates, leading to less direct engagement with the technology.

Geographical location also affects AI utilization. For instance, executives in New York City have a higher adoption rate (73%) compared to those in Los Angeles (60%), highlighting regional differences in embracing AI technologies.

Opportunities and Challenges of AI Implementation

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing industries worldwide, offering unprecedented opportunities alongside significant challenges. A March 2023 report from Goldman Sachs highlights that AI could disrupt up to 300 million jobs globally, particularly in sectors involving routine tasks like office administration, legal work, and engineering. Conversely, AI has the potential to boost global GDP by 7% over time, underscoring its dual role as both a disruptor and a catalyst for growth.

The Hunter Marketing report, “Executive AI: What senior leaders think about AI in the workplace,” reveals that 61% of male executives and 29% of female executives currently use AI, indicating a gender gap in adoption. Age also plays a role, with 61% of executives aged 25 to 44 utilizing AI, compared to only 22% of those aged 65 and above. Income levels influence adoption rates as well; 61% of executives earning between $100,000 and $199,000 use AI, while the rate drops to 53% for those earning over $200,000. Industry-wise, manufacturing (80%) and technology (64%) sectors lead in AI usage, whereas construction (52%) and finance (62%) lag behind. Geographically, executives in New York City (73%) have a higher adoption rate than those in Los Angeles (60%).

Senior business leaders face challenges such as competitors innovating faster (47% of C-level executives). Ethical considerations are paramount, with 68% of leaders not using AI citing ethical concerns. Accuracy is another issue, as 45% of non-AI users believe the technology needs to be more accurate. Ownership concerns are evident, with 72% of executives not using AI stating that responsibility lies with the IT department. Additionally, 62% of business leaders feel the benefits of AI could be more transparent, indicating a need for better education on AI’s potential applications and advantages.

Preparing for an AI-Driven Future: Strategies for Success

As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to reshape industries, organizations must proactively prepare for an AI-driven future. Implementing effective strategies can help businesses navigate this transformation and harness AI’s potential.

Upskill and Reskill Employees

With AI automating routine tasks, the demand for advanced technological skills is rising. Investing in employee training programs focused on AI, machine learning, and data analytics is essential. This approach ensures that the workforce remains adaptable and equipped to handle new roles and responsibilities. According to a McKinsey report, “Automation will accelerate the shift in required workforce skills we have seen over the past 15 years.”

Foster a Culture of Innovation

Encouraging a culture that embraces change and innovation is vital. Regular workshops, training sessions, and brainstorming meetings can help employees explore AI’s potential applications within the organization. This environment promotes creativity and openness to new ideas, facilitating smoother AI integration.

Develop a Clear AI Strategy

A well-defined AI strategy outlines the objectives, goals, and desired outcomes of AI implementation. Identifying areas where AI can have the most significant impact and addressing potential challenges are crucial steps. The McKinsey Global Institute emphasizes the importance of “ensuring robust economic and productivity growth” through strategic AI adoption.

Collaborate with External Partners

Partnering with AI solution providers, research institutions, and industry experts grants access to cutting-edge technology and knowledge. Such collaborations can accelerate AI adoption and provide valuable insights into best practices and emerging trends.

Focus on Ethical AI Implementation

Addressing ethical considerations is paramount. Ensuring transparency, fairness, and accountability in AI deployments builds trust among employees and customers. Establishing clear guidelines and ethical standards for AI use is crucial. The McKinsey report highlights the need to “actively guard against the risks and mitigate any dangers” associated with AI.

Promote Diversity and Inclusion

A diverse and inclusive workforce brings varied perspectives, enhancing AI development and implementation. Addressing gender gaps in AI adoption and ensuring equal access to AI tools and opportunities are essential steps toward fostering inclusivity.

Implement Policies to Support Workforce Transitions

Governments and businesses should collaborate to develop policies supporting workers affected by AI-driven changes. Offering financial assistance for retraining, providing access to education and training programs, and promoting job creation in high-growth sectors are vital measures. The McKinsey Global Institute suggests “rethinking transition support and safety nets for workers affected” by AI.

Thriving in an AI-Driven World

As artificial intelligence reshapes industries and redefines roles, it presents an era filled with both challenges and vast opportunities. Companies that approach AI thoughtfully—investing in employee training, ethical standards, and strategic objectives—are more likely to thrive in this evolving landscape. By embracing a culture of innovation, promoting diversity, and establishing ethical guidelines, organizations can ensure AI serves not only to enhance productivity but also to foster a future where technology and human creativity work hand in hand.

Navigating an AI-driven future requires adaptability, responsibility, and forward-thinking. Businesses that harness AI’s potential thoughtfully will be well-positioned to lead in a world where change is constant. As we look ahead, the integration of AI promises to reshape industries profoundly; the organizations that embrace it strategically will drive the future of work.

Right now, there’s a new space race underway, but it’s not about just getting to the Moon or planting flags. This time, it’s all about finding and using resources out there that could change the game both in space and back on Earth.

Countries like the U.S. and China are leading this charge, each working on big plans for tapping into things like lunar water ice and valuable minerals. And it’s not just governments involved. Private companies like SpaceX and Blue Origin, along with newer startups, are jumping in too, pushing technology to make space mining a reality.

In this article, we’ll look at who’s involved, what they’re planning, and why it matters. With so many players aiming to unlock the potential of space, this race is setting the stage for what could be a whole new era of exploration and opportunity.

The Promise of Space Resources: Why Lunar and Extraterrestrial Resources Matter

Why is there so much interest in mining space? The answer lies in resources that could transform both space missions and life back on Earth. Take the Moon, for example. It’s not just a dry, dusty rock; its poles contain water ice, a resource with incredible potential. In space, water isn’t just for drinking—it can be split into hydrogen and oxygen, meaning it could provide breathable air for astronauts and even fuel for rockets. This makes it much more than a convenience; it’s a game-changer for anyone aiming to explore deeper into the solar system.

Besides water, the Moon and other nearby bodies contain valuable minerals and elements that are tough to find on Earth. One standout is helium-3, a rare isotope that has big potential as a clean energy source. On Earth, helium-3 could be used for nuclear fusion, a process that promises almost unlimited energy with hardly any pollution. It’s an exciting idea, especially as the world looks for cleaner, more sustainable power options.

For governments and private companies, tapping into these resources isn’t just about exploration—it’s about having a shot at future economic power and energy security. Whoever can reach, mine, and use these resources first could lead the next era of technology and even shift global power dynamics. Imagine a future where space minerals fuel new industries, where lunar water supports missions to Mars, and where helium-3 powers entire cities back on Earth. That’s the kind of future these nations and companies have in mind, and it’s why so many are investing heavily in technology to make space mining a reality.

In short, space resources could open the door to long-term missions, a self-sustaining space economy, and solutions to some of Earth’s biggest challenges. It’s not just science fiction anymore—it’s the next big step.

Futuristic Projects: Governments and Private Companies Leading the Charge

Making space mining a reality isn’t easy. It takes cutting-edge tech, major investments, and some seriously ambitious projects. Governments and private companies are both throwing their hats in the ring, each working on plans that could bring space resources within reach.

NASA’s Artemis program is probably the best-known effort right now. Their big goal? To set up a long-term human presence on the Moon. Artemis includes plans to build something called the Lunar Gateway, which is basically a small space station that’ll orbit the Moon and serve as a jumping-off point for astronauts. With the Gateway in place, NASA and its partners can start to dig deeper into the Moon’s surface and figure out how to live and work there. What’s interesting is that this isn’t just a U.S. project—more than 40 countries have signed on through the Artemis Accords, committing to work together as they explore the Moon.

China has its own ambitious plan through the International Lunar Research Station (ILRS). While it’s not as widely advertised, China’s goals are just as big. Teaming up with Russia, they’re working on a state-led lunar base they hope to establish by the late 2020s. China’s approach is a bit different from NASA’s. While NASA partners with private companies, China’s government is running the show, keeping close control over their technology and resources. They’re very focused on making this a strategic win, both in terms of tech and economic advantage.

Private Companies: Pushing Space Tech to New Heights

Private companies are also jumping into the race to make space resources accessible. SpaceX, with its reusable rockets, has already cut down the cost of going to space, and they’re working on lunar landers to support NASA’s missions. Then there’s Blue Origin, Jeff Bezos’s space venture, which is developing its own lunar landers and exploring ways to create a sustainable human presence on the Moon.

On top of that, a wave of startups is getting in on the action. Some are building mining robots that could dig into the Moon’s surface on their own, while others are focused on habitats that could help people live there longer. A big trend is something called “in-situ resource utilization,” or ISRU. This basically means using what’s already on the Moon—like water ice or minerals—so future missions don’t have to bring everything from Earth. It’s all about figuring out how to live off the land in space.

Together, these government programs and private projects are laying the foundation for what could become a true space economy. Governments are building the infrastructure, while private companies are coming up with ways to make mining and resource use practical and affordable. With each new mission, the idea of using space resources to fuel future exploration—and maybe even sustain life beyond Earth—starts to feel a bit more real.

Different Strategies for Space Exploration and Resource Access

The U.S. and China are both serious about leading the way in space, but they’re going about it in pretty different ways. Each country has its own strategy and is picking allies that line up with its goals, creating two very different approaches to the future of space.

The U.S. Game Plan: Teamwork and Partnerships

The U.S. is big on working with others. Through NASA’s Artemis program, they’re teaming up with other countries and private companies to share resources and knowledge. The idea here is that, by joining forces, everyone can make faster progress. The Artemis Accords—signed by over 40 countries—lay out some basic rules for cooperation, like keeping things transparent, peaceful, and fair when it comes to using resources. It’s a way to make sure everyone is on the same page from the start, especially as interest in space mining grows.

NASA also relies a lot on private companies, like SpaceX and Blue Origin, to help bring new technology into the mix. These companies are leading the charge in innovation, and by working with them, NASA doesn’t have to take on all the risk or cost alone. This approach lets the U.S. stay flexible and pull from a wide network of players, from governments to private businesses, all working toward a shared vision for space.

China’s Strategy: A More Solo Approach

China, on the other hand, is keeping things closer to home. Their government runs the show, leading its space missions through the China National Space Administration (CNSA). China has teamed up with Russia to create a lunar research station, but it’s mostly a state-controlled project. This means China is sticking to its own plans, controlling the technology and resources without relying much on other countries or companies. By keeping their space projects in-house, they can focus on their own long-term goals without needing outside support.

China’s centralized approach has some perks—it allows for quicker decisions and makes it easier to stay focused on specific goals. But it also means they aren’t building as many international partnerships, which could become an issue if space exploration gets even more collaborative down the line.

Two Different Paths to the Future of Space

These two strategies reflect two different visions for space. The U.S. is betting on teamwork and open partnerships, while China is focusing on self-reliance and strategic control. Both approaches have their upsides and challenges, and the way they unfold could have a big impact on who gets access to valuable space resources in the years to come.

In the end, this mix of competition and cooperation is likely to shape the rules of space exploration as we know it, with countries and companies figuring out how to work (and sometimes compete) side by side in a brand-new frontier.

The High Stakes and Big Dreams of the New Space Race

We’re in the middle of something exciting—a space race that’s all about using what’s out there to build something new. This isn’t just about putting flags on distant planets anymore. It’s about tapping into resources like water ice, rare minerals, and helium-3 on the Moon—things that could totally change how we live and work, both here on Earth and out there in space.

Sure, there’s competition. But getting this right will take some teamwork too. With so many countries and companies involved, figuring out how to share, cooperate, and play fair is going to be key. If we can strike that balance, space could become a resource that works for everyone.

This race is really about what’s possible. It’s about turning big ideas into real solutions and seeing if space can become a part of our world in ways we’ve only dreamed about. The journey’s just beginning, and where it leads could be incredible.

As climate change becomes a growing reality, cities around the world are stepping up as both contributors to the problem and potential leaders in the solution. With over half of the world’s population living in urban areas, cities generate a large chunk of global emissions—but they also serve as hubs for some of the most exciting climate solutions we’ve seen so far.

From cutting-edge transit systems to clean energy initiatives, cities are proving that innovation and creativity can reshape how we live, work, and connect with the environment. This article shines a light on urban areas that are not just tackling climate change but are transforming themselves into models of sustainable living. These cities are pioneering new ways to create a cleaner, greener future, and their extraordinary projects could be the blueprint for other urban centers worldwide.

How Cities Are Leading the Way in Climate Solutions

Cities have always been at the heart of big changes, and today they’re at the center of one of the biggest challenges we face: climate change. Urban areas are responsible for a large share of greenhouse gas emissions, but they’re also where some of the smartest climate solutions are taking shape. Across the world, a handful of cities aren’t just making small adjustments—they’re coming up with bold, new ways to tackle climate issues right where people live, work, and play.

These changes go far beyond planting a few trees or setting up recycling bins. Some cities are investing in public transit to cut down car trips and pollution, while others are creating jobs in clean energy to support local economies. There are even cities redesigning neighborhoods to reduce the need for cars altogether, giving people better access to parks, shops, and schools close to home.

These projects are powerful because they don’t just address climate change—they make everyday life better for people who live in these cities. Cleaner air, cooler neighborhoods, easier commutes, and green spaces close by all make city living healthier and more enjoyable.

What’s really exciting is that these cities are setting an example that others can follow. They’re proving that it’s possible to balance growth, sustainability, and quality of life. Let’s dive into some of these game-changing projects and see what they’re doing to create a cleaner, greener future.

Standout Cities and Their Eco-Innovations

Around the world, certain cities are standing out for their creative approaches to tackling climate change. These cities are thinking outside the box, with projects that don’t just aim to reduce emissions—they’re changing how people live day to day, often in ways that make life easier and more enjoyable. Let’s take a look at a few cities that are taking big steps toward a greener future.

Boston: Making Public Transit a Top Choice

Boston is on a mission to get more people out of their cars and onto public transit. The city wants to cut single-occupancy car trips in half by 2030, and they’re starting with a pilot program that’s giving free transit and bike passes to 1,000 residents in neighborhoods that were hit hard by the pandemic. The idea is simple: make transit more accessible and affordable, so people choose it over driving.

Early results have been promising, with bus and subway use tripling among those who received the passes. Building on this success, Boston has even used pandemic relief funds to keep some bus routes fare-free. This isn’t just about cutting emissions; it’s about making commuting more affordable and convenient, especially for those who need it most.

Columbus: Clean Energy with a Focus on Jobs

Columbus, Ohio, has set ambitious goals for reducing emissions—45% by 2030—but they’re also focused on creating opportunities for the community along the way. Through the Clean Energy Columbus initiative, the city is working to generate renewable energy with a special focus on job creation. This approach is expected to create up to 4,000 new jobs in Ohio, especially for underrepresented groups like people of color, women, and low-income youth.

What’s unique about Columbus’s plan is how they’re tying climate action to economic growth. The city is proving that clean energy isn’t just good for the environment; it’s also a chance to build a more inclusive economy. As Columbus’s Chief Sustainability Officer put it, having a clear vision for both the environment and community support helps to keep everyone aligned and motivated.

Honolulu: Reducing Traffic and Emissions with Rapid Transit Upgrades

Honolulu, famous for its beautiful beaches—and its traffic jams—is turning to clean transit to make commuting smoother and greener. The city recently fast-tracked a new bus lane on King Street, its busiest street, cutting commute times and making public transit more appealing. This project happened much faster than usual thanks to collaboration across four city departments, reducing the timeline by about a year.

The King Street bus lane is already making a difference, cutting down on delays and helping more people choose public transit over driving. This model is now being used to speed up other transit projects in Honolulu, including future bike and pedestrian paths. It’s a small but powerful shift that shows how making transit faster and more reliable can reduce emissions and ease daily commutes.

St. Paul: Making Electric Vehicles Accessible to All

St. Paul, Minnesota, is thinking big about transportation, with an equity-focused electric car-sharing program called Evie Carshare. This program puts 170 electric vehicles and 70 charging stations across the city, giving residents, especially those from under-resourced areas, access to affordable, eco-friendly transportation.

The city’s goal with Evie Carshare is to make the benefits of electric vehicles available to everyone, not just those who can afford to buy one. St. Paul’s Chief Resilience Officer explained that the community wanted climate action to be inclusive and accessible, and this program is a step in that direction. It’s a reminder that when it comes to climate solutions, accessibility and equity matter just as much as technology.

Transformative Climate Resilience Projects

As climate change brings more intense weather, cities are facing new risks like extreme heat, floods, and storms. Some cities are taking these challenges head-on, putting plans in place to protect people and infrastructure from the effects of a changing climate. The goal isn’t just to react to problems after they happen, but to build resilience so that urban life can withstand what’s to come.

Austin: Fighting Urban Heat with Trees

In Austin, Texas, the summer heat can feel relentless, especially in neighborhoods packed with concrete and fewer trees. Austin’s solution? Invest in “urban greening”—adding more trees and green spaces to cool down the city naturally. Their Climate Equity Plan aims to increase the city’s tree canopy, with a focus on planting in historically underserved neighborhoods where extreme heat hits the hardest.

Studies have shown that more tree coverage can cool urban temperatures by up to 9°F, which is huge during heatwaves. For Austin, it’s about more than just cooling the city; it’s about creating a fairer, healthier environment for everyone, especially those who have been impacted by climate change the most.

Tokyo: Climate-Proofing Buildings for Extreme Weather

Tokyo, Japan, has to contend with earthquakes, typhoons, and flooding, all of which are becoming more frequent and severe. To prepare, Tokyo has adopted some of the most advanced building codes in the world. New buildings are now designed to withstand everything from powerful earthquakes to heavy storms, using special materials and construction techniques like seismic base isolation systems.

This proactive approach has made Tokyo a model for resilience. According to a report by the World Bank, these climate-proof buildings could reduce economic losses from natural disasters by up to 30% in urban areas. For Tokyo, it’s about safety, but it’s also about keeping the city functioning smoothly, no matter what the weather brings.

New York City: Protecting Public Transit from Future Floods

When Hurricane Sandy hit New York City in 2012, it flooded the subway system, shutting down transit for days. Since then, the city has invested heavily in making the subway more resilient. Flood barriers, raised entrances, and waterproofed equipment are just a few of the upgrades New York has made to protect this essential part of the city’s infrastructure.

Now, the subway is better prepared to handle extreme weather events, reducing potential damage by half compared to pre-Sandy conditions. For a city like New York, where millions rely on public transit daily, these improvements are critical. They show how a little foresight can go a long way in protecting city life from the worst effects of climate change.

Each of these projects is more than just a protective measure—they’re part of a larger shift toward building cities that can adapt to and thrive in an uncertain climate. When cities invest in resilience, they’re not just preparing for tomorrow’s challenges; they’re making life better today.

The “15-Minute City” – Living Close, Living Green

Imagine a city where everything you need—your job, groceries, parks, schools—is just a short walk or bike ride away. That’s the vision behind the “15-Minute City.” It’s a way of designing neighborhoods so people don’t have to drive to get things done. This idea isn’t just better for the environment; it also helps build closer, friendlier communities.

Here’s how two cities are making this vision a reality.

Melbourne: Building “20-Minute Neighborhoods”

Melbourne, Australia, is bringing this idea to life with its “20-Minute Neighborhood” plan. The goal? Make sure that essential services are close enough that people can walk, bike, or use public transit to reach them in 20 minutes or less.

Studies from the University of Melbourne show these neighborhoods do more than cut traffic—they actually make people feel more connected and less stressed. It’s pretty simple: less time in the car means more time with family and friends. Melbourne is proving that planning for the planet can also make life better and simpler for everyone.

Paris: Bringing Life Closer to Home

Paris has taken the “15-Minute City” idea to heart. Led by Mayor Anne Hidalgo, the city is changing its streets to make them more welcoming for walking and biking. They’ve added green spaces, cut back on car lanes, and made neighborhoods feel more open and inviting.

The changes are already paying off. More people are choosing to walk or bike instead of drive, and neighborhoods feel more lively. By making essentials easy to reach, Paris is showing that city life can be less hectic and more community-focused. It’s a powerful example of how smart design can make cities better places to live.

The “15-Minute City” isn’t just about lowering emissions. It’s about creating neighborhoods where people have everything close by and life feels more connected. As more cities try out this idea, urban living could become greener, simpler, and a lot more enjoyable.

Cities Making a Real Difference

Cities around the world are showing us that change is possible, and it’s already happening. They’re finding smart ways to clean up the air, reduce traffic, create green spaces, and make city life better overall. These changes aren’t just good for the environment—they’re helping people live healthier, happier lives.

Think of a city where everything is close by, the air feels cleaner, and there are more places to relax and enjoy the outdoors. That’s what these cities are building. They’re not just preparing for the future—they’re making life better today.

What’s even more exciting is that they’re setting an example for others. If more cities join in, we’ll see urban living shift into something greener, friendlier, and more connected. It’s a big job, but with cities like these leading the way, we’re heading toward a brighter, more sustainable future.

(ZH) – Accuweather has declared Hurricane Ian made landfall around 1420 ET on North Captiva Island, a barrier island just west of Fort Myers, Florida. The storm came ashore with maximum sustained winds of 155 mph.

This is absolutely shocking… 

* * * 

Update (1247ET): 

The National Weather Service reports powerful Hurricane Ian is nearing landfall on the southwest coast of Florida. NWS expects “catastrophic storm surge and wind damage” will occur across Charlotte County, just north of Fort Myers. 

Recent readings showed Ian had sustained winds of 155 mph, only 2 mph shy of a Category 5 storm. As of 1144 ET, the storm’s “outer eyewall” was about 20 miles from land, according to meteorologist Jason Boyer. 

NWS provided satellite footage of Ian encompassing nearly the whole state of Florida. 

NWS shows a 12-18 feet storm surge forecasted for Charlotte County. 

Horrifying videos have been posted on social media showing Ian’s wrath ahead of landfall expected this afternoon. 

* * *

Update (0739ET): 

Hurricane Ian continues to strengthen ahead of landfall. As of 0733 ET, the National Hurricane Center said Ian’s sustained maximum winds were 155 mph, just 2 mph shy of a Cat. 5 storm. 

* * * 

Hurricane Ian strengthened into a powerful Category 4 storm expected to make landfall on Florida’s southwest coast today and then traverse central Florida and emerge in the Atlantic by Thursday. 

At 0500 ET, the National Hurricane Center said Ian sustained maximum winds of 140 mph and gusts up to 165 mph. The storm’s center was about 75 miles west-southwest of Naples and 105 miles south-southwest of Punta Gorda, moving north-northeast at 10 mph. 

“Ian is forecast to approach the west coast of Florida as an extremely dangerous major hurricane, weakening is expected after landfall.

“On the forecast track, the center of Ian is expected to approach the west coast of Florida within the hurricane warning area this morning, and move onshore later today. The center of Ian is forecast to move over central Florida tonight and Thursday morning and emerge over the western Atlantic by late Thursday,” NHC senior hurricane specialist Daniel Brown told Orlando Sentinel. 

Ian’s path has shifted south of Tampa Bay, and landfall is now expected between Fort Myers and Sarasota on Wednesday morning or early afternoon before moving across the central part of the state. 

NHC warned a “life-threatening storm surge is expected along the Florida west coast and the Lower Florida Keys,” with “devastating wind damage” expected near Ian’s center.

“Catastrophic flooding is expected across portions of central Florida with considerable flooding in southern Florida, northern Florida, southeastern Georgia and coastal South Carolina,” the weather agency continued.

“It’s going to be historic,” National Weather Service Melbourne meteorologist Kole Fehling in Melbourne, referring to the storm’s landfall impacts. 

Fehling said Central Florida could be swamped with 15 to 20 inches of rainfall, with some areas receiving upwards of 24 inches. 

“The normal value for the amount of rainfall over the entire year is about 52 inches,” he said. “So if we were to see those higher- end totals, we could be experiencing half of our total annual rainfall in a very short period of time.”

On Tuesday night, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis told residents: 

“You need to evacuate now. You’re going to start feeling major impacts of this storm relatively soon.” 

Millions of Floridians are under evacuation orders or advisories as DeSantis activated the National Guard earlier this week before the storm’s arrival. 

There are notable economic impacts due to adverse weather conditions in the region. On Tuesday evening, US energy companies idled 190,000 barrels of daily crude production, some 11% of US Gulf of Mexico output. 

Bloomberg pointed out that the “nation’s production of phosphate fertilizer” is in the storm’s path. 

Chuck Watson, a disaster modeler with Enki Research, said Mosaic’s New Wales plant is “right in the middle of the damage swath,” adding the facility “could be out for weeks.” 

Bloomberg said Ian could cause $45 billion in damage, which would make it one of the most costly storms in the country’s history. 

By late Tuesday, over 2,000 flights to and from Florida were canceled. Flight delays and cancelations could spill over to the rest of the country. 

Republished from Zero hedge with permission.

As the West Coast faces an unprecedented wave of fires across multiple states, bird lovers in California are realizing that many birds are simply disappearing or worse, turning up dead.

In the Birding California group on Facebook, bird watchers discussed the total silence that has come to their backyards, where the sounds of birds chirping and singing used to greet them in the morning.

“I live in Folsom—have not seen a bird or heard a bird chirp this morning,” said Jodi Root.

“We live in northern Nevada and have noticed the same thing,” added Gardnerville resident Karen Holden.

“Same here in Napa,” said Tammy Saunders, who said that things had become “very quiet which just adds to the eeriness of the orange colored dark sky.”

Almost 100 seasoned birdwatchers gave similar responses to the survey, with most noting that they saw a marked decline in birds visiting their feeders and birdbaths, as well as a clear thinning-out of the variety of species.

Like the insects that many birds rely on for food, wild bird populations have been in a state of major decline over recent years. However, the record-shattering heatwave and smokey, toxic air conditions in California and other western states haven’t only impacted human populations. Tragically, the ash that is falling across West Coast cities isn’t only comprised of trees and brush, but also includes the incinerated remains of birds and other creatures caught in the wildfires.

And as Deborah Pertersen of Inside Climate News reports, birds – with their highly sensitive respiratory systems that are instantly responsive to changes in environmental conditions – are acting as the global equivalent to the canary in a coal mine, at a time when seemingly the entire planet is on fire.

While much still remains unknown about how smoke impacts bird populations, doctoral candidate Andrew Stillman of the University of Connecticut notes that birds perpetually live on the edge, and extreme changes can have dire consequences for bird species.

“One thing that is important to point out is we do know high levels of smoke exposure can be harmful to birds,” Stillman told Inside Climate News. And unlike humans, birds “cannot escape like humans by going indoors.”

Veterinarians and bird scientists have also found that smoke can leave a damaging impact on the lung tissue of captive birds, leaving them susceptible to deadly respiratory infections, notes the Audubon Society.

 “We do know that exposure to particulate matter, which of course is of great concern for human health, can affect birds as well,” said Olivia Sanderfoot, a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow at the University of Washington Seattle who studies the impact of air pollution on birds.

And while the still-raging fires haven’t given researchers much of a chance to survey the population of birds along the west coast, the anecdotal evidence stacking up is clearly showing that the health effects of the massive plumes of smoke coming from over 85 fires raging in western states is hitting bird populations hard.

“Overall, it seems like the anecdotes suggest that there is a decline in bird activity during smoke events,” said Olivia Sanderfoot, a researcher at the University of Washington.

In a 2017 paper, Sanderfoot and Tracey Holloway wrote that “Birds have long been recognized as sentinel species for environmental change.” 

The literature review concluded that “Exposure to air pollution clearly causes respiratory distress in birds and increases their susceptibility to respiratory infection,” in addition to causing complications to bird reproduction.

However, the science of wildfire smoke’s impact on birds remains largely undeveloped.

“We know pretty much nothing about the long-term impact of smoke on birds,” Sanderfoot said.

Indeed, most of the research on birds only covers a handful of species, and most of it focuses on air pollution rather than wildfire smoke.

“Of the roughly 10 000 species of birds known worldwide, only a few have been studied to characterize avian responses to air pollution, and the animals used in laboratory experiments may not be representative of the wild bird species most at risk from air pollution,” Sanderfoot and Holloway wrote.

Sanderfoot and her fellow researchers are now conducting studies in Washington, a state which saw some of the most hazardous air pollution ever recorded over the past week. Sanderfoot and her team are planting microphones and cameras in smokey areas to register whether bird songs decrease in high-smoke areas.

Tara Sears Lee, a nursery volunteer in Los Alto, California, has also observed the terrible impact of smoke on birds in recent days.

“Outside for 6 hours yesterday and no jays, crows, ravens, quail, turkeys, or hawks – all usual and very vocal visitors,” she wrote on Facebook. “Only hummingbirds, juncos, towhees and titmice. Worst of all was a dead hummingbird just lying on the ground – had heard they are being overcome by heat and smoke and just drop dead.”

Birders across the state are also posting photos on their Facebook accounts of dead hummingbirds in their backyards or, inversely, boosted numbers of birds at their backyard feeders – a result of the forced migration caused by fires.

“I think all the birds came to my house south of San Jose. Sometimes there will be more than 40-50 out there,” wrote Charlotte Trethway Noriega on Facebook.

As Petersen explains in her article, bird populations in North America have plummeted by 29 percent – or three billion birds – since 1970. And according to a 2019 study, rampant high temperatures resulting from climate change are likely to drastically alter the migration patterns of bird species. With pastures and grasslands being converted to crops, nesting places have dwindled along with the mass die-offs of insects eliminated by pesticides.

However, Stillman is finding some small traces of hope in his research of birds that have thrived in areas hit by wildfires. Black-backed woodpeckers are quickly returning to burned-out areas to feed on the larvae of wood-boring beetles that thrive on dying trees burned in fires.

However, Stillman notes “a very big caveat”: the new generation of “mega fires” like the one the West Coast is currently undergoing is far more destructive than those of the past, and the question of “how are the birds responding to this new normal” remains open.

(TMU) — Spectacular video footage has been captured showing dolphins literally glowing in neon blue as they swim off the coast of Southern California.

The brilliant scene was captured on Wednesday just as night fell on Newport Beach in Orange County.

The footage was taken by photographer Patrick Coyne of the website Orange County Outdoors, who recently garnered international headlines after taking photos of crashing blue bioluminescent waves in the same coastal waters last week.

Orange County Register reports that Coyne and his fried Ryan Lawler, the owner of Newport Coastal Adventure, were out at sea in an inflatable boat hoping to capture video of creatures illuminated by the bioluminescent water, a natural phenomenon that has allowed Coyne and his colleagues to garner worldwide attention and once-in-a-lifetime shots every photographer dreams of.

The two were just about to call it quits when they suddenly noticed two dolphins near them, who appeared out of the pitch black ocean to swim alongside their small boat. The contrast of the deep, dark ocean water against their illuminated, slender bodies was something they couldn’t believe—and it lasted for about 15 minutes.

Lawler explained:

“They were bow riding, they were super into the boat. About five minutes in, two more came and we had a little pod of four dolphins … It was amazing.”

 

View this post on Instagram

 

•Dolphins Swimming in Bioluminescence• Last night was truly one of the most magical nights of my life. Capt. Ryan @lawofthelandnsea of @newportcoastaladventure invited me along to capture rare video of Dolphins swimming in bioluminescence. The first time I saw this actually filmed was a few months back while watching a Night on Earth documentary on Netflix. The second I saw that footage it became a dream of mine to one day capture something similar and that’s exactly what we did. This was by far the most challenging video I’ve shot for a number of reason. For starters the bioluminescence has sweet spots to where it shows up and then fades away so while on the water it’s impossible to just find it. Not only that but actually finding any type of animal in pitch black is just so ridiculously hard. Conditions have to be absolutely perfect for the bioluminescence to show up and to have an animal swim through it so we can film it. On top of all that just trying to nail the focus at such a wide aperture with something moving in the water was a nightmare. We were out for a few hours and on our final stretch back we finally had 2 Dolphins pop up to start the incredible glowing show. A few minutes later and we were greeted by a few more which was insane. I’m honestly still processing this all and I can’t thank @newportcoastaladventure enough for having me out because without them none of this would be possible. Be sure to check our their edit from last night as well! I hope you all enjoy this video. ——————————————————————————— Shot on a Sony a7Sii with a Rokinon 35mm Cine DS T1.5 Len. Shutter speed: 1/50 Aperture T2 ISO 80,000

A post shared by Patrick Coyne (@patrickc_la) on Apr 23, 2020 at 8:40pm PDT

Coyne was simply blown away by the moment. He said:

“I was like, this can’t be happening.

“This is so magical. After the two dolphins were playing with us, a few more joined in.”

The rare spectacle of glowing blue water caused by algal blooms has been present off some beaches along the Pacific Coast in the past week, most notably in Newport Beach and Acapulco.

The natural phenomenon is known as bioluminescence, and is caused by an increase in the dinoflagellate population. The dinoflagellates—which are tiny, swimming plants—include Lingulodinium polyedra, which is responsible for the glowing waves. Dinoflagellates contain enzymes and proteins that create small light flashes.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

•Newport Beach Bioluminescence• Last nights bioluminescence in Newport Beach was incredible! So far it’s the brightest I’ve ever seen. My buddy @markgirardeau called me letting me know that there was a red tide which was originally discovered by @visual_burrito earlier that day. It doesn’t always happen but a red tide could indicate some bioluminescence which is why we went. Keeping our distance of course I ended up getting some pretty incredible video showing how blue and bright it really was. If you’ve never seen bioluminescence before it’s definitely something you have to see with your own eyes! Newport Beach is among some of the beaches in Orange County that are still open, just wanted to mention that. Hope you guys enjoy the videos! ——————————————————————————— Filmed on my Sony a7iii with a Rokinon 35mm Cine DS T1.5 Setting we’re: Shutter speed 1/50 T1.5 ISO 80,000

A post shared by Patrick Coyne (@patrickc_la) on Apr 16, 2020 at 7:37pm PDT

During the day, the algal bloom appears as a deep red, rusty tide due to the heavy concentration of small photosynthetic organisms floating up to the surface. When the sun goes down, however, movements such as crashing waves—or in this case, swimming dolphins—make the tiny organisms display light.

Describing the bioluminescence he witnessed last week, Coyne said:

“As soon as the set crashes, it’s a burst of blue light. It’s not always the perfect burst of blue light, you want it to be dark.

“Once it hits, it’s a burst of blue light and you get that color. And it really does look like what you see in pictures and videos.”

Coyne had been dreaming of capturing such night-time footage of dolphins ever since he saw the Netflix film, “Night on Earth,” which used moonlight-sensitive, high-tech low-light cameras and heat-tracking technology to capture nocturnal scenes of marine life.

“It’s not something you can just plan. It was showing up in little sections, we would drive the boat a bit, it would be bright and then it would go away.

“You can’t really find it, it’s pitch black. We could see it when it would start glowing, there’s no way for us to predict it.”

Coyne admits that the moment was so “magical” that he couldn’t help but shed a tear.

“Hands down the most incredible experience of my life.

“I’ve been really lucky, this truly tops everything.”

“We’re pretty proud of [the dolphin footage.]

“I don’t know how many people will ever see that in their life. I didn’t think I’d ever see this in my life, to be honest. It was truly one of the most magical nights of my life.”

By Elias Marat | Creative Commons | TheMindUnleashed.com

(TMU) — By all indications, it looks like the moment of truth may finally be upon us as officials and alien enthusiasts alike brace themselves for a pair of events this weekend featuring the secretive Area 51 military base in Nevada.

Thousands of UFO fans are winding down their pilgrimage across Nevada, where the “Storm Area 51” Facebook event has morphed into multiple competing events in Last Vegas, Rachel, and Hiko after the Facebook event’s creator pulled out of a planned music festival near Area 51 in fear of “Frye Fest 2.0.”

“Alienstock” took place last night in Las Vegas. Announcing the move, a statement on the Alienstock website read:

“Due to the lack of infrastructure, planning, and risk management, along with concerns raised for the safety of the expected 10,000+ attendees, we decided to transition Alienstock away from the Rachel festival towards a safer alternative. We are officially disconnecting from the Little A’LE’INN, Rachel NV, and AlienStock’s affiliation with them.

We will no longer offer our logo, social media, website or Matty Roberts likeness or scheduled appearance. In short, the relationship has ended permanently. AlienStock will be moving to a safe, clean secure area in Downtown Las Vegas as an alternative. We are not interested in, nor will we tolerate any involvement in a FYREFEST 2.0. We foresee a possible humanitarian disaster in the works, and we can’t participate in any capacity at this point.”

Luke Rudkowski of We Are Change attended Alienstock last night before heading north toward Area 51.

In a statement sent to the Mind Unleashed last week, the team representing the Little A’Le’Inn said, “Amidst false accusations and rumors, the residents of Rachel Nevada are excited to announce that Alienstock is, in fact, still happening at the Little A’Le’Inn on September 19 – 22nd. With thousands slated to attend and artists traveling in from all over the country, this is sure to be a once-in-this-universe experience.”

“Alienstock has been thoroughly planned, approved, and locally supported. All permits, permissions, and down-payments have been made and correctly filed,” the statement continued.

By all indications, it appears the true alien hunters began gathering last night in the desert of Nevada just north of where those simply seeking an out of this world party enjoyed themselves last night.

On Thursday, a news segment aired by local ABC affiliate KTNV showed an attendee practicing his Naruto run, named after Japanese anime character Naruto Uzumaki, who is known for running with his arms swept back as he runs face-first toward battle.

Even the U.S. Air Force has been briefing their ranks on the definition of the run, which has become a part of the Storm Area 51 meme.

By early Friday, dozens of people from across the U.S. began converging on the gate of Area 51 near Rachel in hopes to take selfies near the notorious site and its signs warning of how the military will violently defend the base, reports CBS News.

And if you’re a still a little confused about what exactly went down when it comes to planning these events and what is happening today and where, you’re not the only one. Even people there don’t seen to know exactly what is taking place.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlKJ83LVnL8

Meanwhile, about 45 minutes down the “Extraterrestrial Highway” from Rachel, partiers and ufologists are getting ready to attend Storm Area 51 Basecamp, which is being held at the Alien Research Center souvenir shop in Hiko.

The company made special staff shirts for the occasion. #area51 #stormarea51 #alienstock pic.twitter.com/dd2X9vojqf

— Mick Akers (@mickakers) September 19, 2019

Organizers have already put together a medical team clad in t-shirt uniforms and entertainment offerings including films and music performances from the likes of DJ Paul Oakenfold.

Even the food and drink industry have jumped onto the bandwagon, with Bud Light having stepped up as the official sponsor of yesterday’s Area 51 Celebration in downtown Las Vegas, while fast food chain Arby’s plans to serve a “special alien-themed menu” at Storm Area 41 Basecamp that will include colorful “galaxy shakes” and “redacted on rye” roast beef sandwiches.

Indeed, authorities have been less than happy with the plans to “storm” the location, which is located within the US Air Force’s Nevada Test and Training Range. The military has issued stern warnings to use deadly force if civilians break into the base, while local and state officials have promised to make arrests if people make any such attempt.

In a warning that was equal parts menacing and tantalizing, Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David Goldfein told reporters Tuesday:

“All joking aside, we’re taking it very seriously … Our nation has secrets, and those secrets deserve to be protected. The people deserve to have our nation’s secrets protected.”

Earlier this week, the Federal Aviation Administration also issued “temporary flight restrictions for special security reasons“—effectively a no-fly zone—banning any sorts of aircraft from the airspace surrounding the base, while authorities in Lincoln and Nye County have established “operations centers” that they hope will tackle any problems arising from the potentially tens of thousands of curious visitors expected to swarm the sparsely populated area.

Even local residents in Rachel are up in arms—possibly in the literal sense of the term—over the convergences. In forceful language, the town website announced:

“At this time we have to warn people against coming to Rachel for the botched [event] … We expect riots when those visitors that may show up and paid good money find out that the reality looks nothing like what they were promised.

People will get hurt.

STAY AWAY FROM RACHEL.”

University of Nevada – Las Vegas sociologist Michael Borer told CBS that the events are “a perfect blend of interest in aliens and the supernatural, government conspiracies, and the desire to know what we don’t know.”

Continuing, he explained:

“People desire to be part of something, to be ahead of the curve.

Area 51 is a place where normal, ordinary citizens can’t go. When you tell people they can’t do something, they just want to do it more.”

By Elias Marat | Creative Commons | TheMindUnleashed.com

(TMU) — The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announced on Monday that it launched an investigation into the fast-growing phenomenon of people getting “severe” lung disease in connection with vaping.

According to the CDC, nearly 100 people have contracted serious and often life-threatening lung illnesses that may be linked to their use of illicit e-cigarettes, which heat oils into inhalable aerosols, allowing users to consume nicotine, THC or CBD in a highly discrete and smoke-free manner.

The news comes as counterfeit vaping cartridges proliferate across the U.S. with generic packaging and false labels that obscure the fact that they contain a number of mysterious adulterants including cough syrup, various hydrocarbons, toxic heavy metals such as lead, and dangerous synthetic cannabinoids —a category that includes the lethal drug K2 or “spice.”

In many cases, black-market cartridges also contain myclobutanil—a fungicide that when heated releases hydrogen cyanide, a chemical found in Zyklon-B, the poison used in Nazi gas chambers during the Holocaust.

https://www.instagram.com/p/B0zjDSrBPVx/

On Saturday, the CDC confirmed that they were looking into “94 possible cases of severe lung illness associated with vaping reported in 14 states from June 28, 2019, to August 15, 2019 (this includes 30 cases in Wisconsin).” Other states involved in the investigation include California, Illinois, Indiana, and Minnesota.

The CDC further stated that they would investigate “a cluster of pulmonary illnesses linked to e-cigarette product use, or ‘vaping,’ primarily among adolescents and young adults. Additional states have alerted CDC to possible (not confirmed) cases and investigations into these cases are ongoing. There is no conclusive evidence that an infectious disease is causing the illnesses. While some cases in each of the states are similar and appear to be linked to e-cigarette product use, more information is needed to determine what is causing the illnesses.”

The announcement comes after officials in Kings County, California announced last Wednesday that seven people have been hospitalized with pneumonia-like symptoms in the rural town of Hanford after buying unregulated cannabis vaporizer cartridges tainted with deadly toxins.

Within the past month alone, six people in their 20s and one 60-year-old have been placed in intensive care for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (SARDS), with two of the patients requiring mechanical ventilation to prevent them from dying, reports Leafly.

Officials in California have long urged consumers to avoid unlicensed cannabis vaping cartridges, colloquially known as “carts,” due to the lack of rigorous testing that legal cannabis products undergo. Officials aren’t yet certain that illegal carts are the culprit in the hospitalizations, but the common nexus in each of the cases is that those who fell ill were using bootleg cartridges.

In each of the cases, patients bought untested THC products that looked remarkably similar to those sold in legal dispensaries. Street dealers typically need only to buy empty vape cartridges from China, through eBay or other intermediaries like Alibaba, before filling them with raw THC oil cut with a variety of different additives ranging from vegetable glycerin to fungicides, and packaging it in generic boxes that falsely advertise the alleged properties and strains contained in the product.

Before long, users who imbibe of the counterfeit carts often report having heart palpitations, shortness of breath, headaches, and other symptoms related to inhaling the mysterious oils.

https://www.instagram.com/p/Bz4EKIBhILh/

Dr. Milton Teske, a health officer with the Kings County Department of Public Health and longtime emergency room physician, said:

“If you’re going to vape THC, get it from a licensed dispensary where you know there’s a certain amount of testing required to do. It sounds like it’s going to cost twice as much as the stuff on the street, but you don’t want to end up in with a life-threatening respiratory condition … Anyone that vapes THC they got off the street and has shortness of breath, tightness in the chest, and trouble breathing—go to the ER and tell them you’re vaping, and have heard about this acute respiratory distress syndrome developing from that.” 

Teske explained:

“Almost every patient had a different brand name … And everyone had purchased it on the street.

Whoever is mixing it up in their garage, they’re adding other flavors, I suspect, or it’s how they’re diluting it. I suspect it’s some type of hydrocarbon.”

In another case that has been gaining widespread media coverage, a 26-year old Wisconsin man has been placed in a medically-induced coma after vaping bootleg cannabis oil sold under the popular black-market brand name, Dank Vapes. The patient’s brother has told a number of outlets that he holds the notorious brand responsible for the life-threatening lung and heart damage the young man sustained.

In a newly-published investigative report by Inverse, the so-called cartridge company Dank Vapes—whose products can be found from Toronto to Mexico City—was exposed as being not so much an actual cannabis company, but as a purveyor of packaging for illicit cartridges.

Mark Hoashi, the founder of Doja App, explained:

“They act like a cannabis company but they actually don’t exist. They’re in the packaging industry … These are just people filling cartridges as ‘Dank Vapes.’ It’s not a singular facility. It’s just people in their garages filling them and selling them.”

Most alarmingly, the problem of black-market cartridges likely won’t go away any time soon. After all, people want to get high for a low price—and the prohibitively high costs of top-shelf legal cannabis will always ensure a customer base for shady cart-slangers.

As “hallinsco,” the host of the Stay High, Stay Humble podcast, told Inverse:

“The Dank Vapes brand will continue to get bigger and grow more in illegal states … They are cheaper, and even in legal states where legal meds are taxed very high, some people still prefer the cheaper options on the black market.”

In California, the Bureau of Cannabis Control is hoping that an old-fashioned campaign of public service announcements titled “Get #Weedwise” can educate consumers about the dangers of consuming black market cartridges. Bureau communications chief Alex Traverso said:

“This is the entire reason why we are running our get weed wise campaign. To educate the public about the importance of shopping from licensed retailers only. There are things out of your control when you decide to purchase cannabis from the illegal market. Your health is more important than cost.”

But for those of us who live in a state or country where legally-licensed cannabis isn’t yet a reality, it may be best to just stick to smoking flower in the analog style. As Josh Wurzer, the founder of licensed California cannabis analysis lab SC Labs told Leafly:

“Black market cannabis was a relatively safe product for so long because—outside of illegal pesticide use—it is hard or impractical to adulterate it to the point it’s going to lead to a public health issue. However with these vape cartridges, it doesn’t have to be nefarious, it can just be incompetence. You need to be very careful about the purity of the cannabinoids, terpenes, and any additives you use, but you need to monitor the quality of the materials used to manufacture the cartridges themselves.

You don’t want to trust your lungs with some chemicals someone mixed up in their garage!”

View this post on Instagram

You wouldn’t eat food that poses health risks. So why risk purchasing cannabis that contains toxic pesticides, dangerous chemicals, and harmful fungi? ??? – Know what's in your grow – Get #weedwise and purchase safe cannabis from licensed retailers only. Visit CApotcheck.com for more information. ?✅? – #cannabis #cannabiscommunity #cannabisculture #safecannabis #getweedwise #weedwise #californiacannabis #californiagrown #legalcannabis #bureauofcannabiscontrol #cannabisnews #capotcheck #retailer #dispensary #licensed #legalshop #pesticides #chemicals #safe

A post shared by Bureau of Cannabis Control (@bureauofcannabiscontrol) on Aug 14, 2019 at 2:01pm PDT

By Elias Marat | Creative Commons | TheMindUnleashed.com

(FEE) — For three years, the pair scrimped and saved in order to fix up the four-unit property. On the weekends, Ramouldo would spend his days off making the 11-hour drive from New Jersey to Michigan to work on the house, making the much-needed repairs himself. In addition to the small complex, the family had purchased a small home next door. The plan was to renovate and rent out each unit and then use that money to help Ramouldo retire and move his family to the small home in Michigan, where the rest of their extended family resides.

Erica, who had seen her father work long hours and sacrifice to provide for her family over the years, was happy to help her father buy the property. She was eager to begin building her own financial legacy and saw the property as an excellent investment opportunity.

These plans were derailed, however, when their property was seized by Wayne County, Michigan, in 2017 and sold to a private buyer.

All because they unknowingly underpaid their tax bill—by $144.

Disproportionate Punishment

While the father and daughter had been paying their property taxes diligently for each year they owned the property, in 2014, they unintentionally underpaid by $144. Neither knew about this miscalculation or the situation could have quickly been remedied. And without knowledge of this outstanding debt, the small amount grew as the county tacked on interest charges to the tune of $359.

To be sure, when interest was accounted for, the Perez family did owe roughly $500 in unpaid taxes to the county. County officials used this as justification to seize, sell, and then keep the $108,000 revenue earned from the sale of said property.

In the American legal system, there is a maxim: the punishment must fit the crime. But when considering the small amount by which the Perez family underpaid their property taxes, this seems like a disproportionate punishment to receive.

The government is allowed to seize property in order to settle a debt owed by an individual. However, it isn’t allowed to take more than it is owed. And in the instance of the Perez family property, Wayne County kept every penny it earned from the sale of their property—a practice known as home equity theft.

Fortunately, Pacific Legal Foundation (PLF) has stepped in and on July 9th, announced that it had filed suit on behalf of the Perez family against Wayne County and County Treasurer Eric Sabree.

Home Equity Theft

Many of us have accidentally underpaid a bill before. Whether we were distracted, busy, or simply not paying enough attention to the total amount due, accidents happen to everyone. Eager to get the full amount owed, most companies will send strongly worded letters or call incessantly until you cough up the remaining amount due. It’s completely understandable as to why an entity would do this: they want what is owed.

However, if they tried to take your car away over the miscalculation of a few dollars, most people would be angry—and justifiably so.

When it comes to property taxes, if an individual underpays by even just a few dollars, there are 12 different state governments that can and will seize your property and sell it, without having to pay you a dime of the earnings. This is known as home equity theft. Unfortunately, the Perez family is not the only victim of this practice in Michigan.

In 2014, Uri Refaeli lost his home after it was foreclosed on and seized by Oakland County, Michigan. In 2011, Rafaeli purchased a small $60,000 property for his business, Rafaeli, LLC. While he had paid his 2012 and 2013 property taxes in full, he discovered that he had accidentally underpaid in 2011. When he made this realization and tried to correct his mistake in 2013, he forgot to account for the interest that had accrued on his back taxes. As a result, he underpaid by a measly $8.41. The county seized and sold his property for $24,500. Rafaeli never saw a dime of this money.

When it comes to outstanding debt, just like private companies, governments are eager to get what is owed and there nothing wrong with them attempting to do so. However, when they begin to go after more than they are owed, the situation becomes troublesome.

To make matters worse for Michigan, the state also has a shady reputation for using this practice to its own benefit. According to Pacific Legal Foundation (PLF), local governments pad their budgets with the money earned from this stolen property. Each year in Detroit’s budget, there is a line with the estimated total revenue that the government is expecting to bring in from foreclosures of this very nature.

Earlier this year, it was discovered that Wayne County Treasurer Eric Sabree had violated Treasurer’s office rules by funneling foreclosed properties to family members and well-established and connected businessman for a fraction of the cost.

While state Treasurer’s office rules prohibit family members from participating in these auctions, several Freedom of Information Act requests filed on behalf of a Detroit News investigation found that transfers involving Sabree’s family overlap with his time in office. Since 2011, when Sabree began as deputy treasurer, Wayne County has transferred ownership of more than 1/4 of privately owned properties in Detroit as a result of back taxes—making the whole situation in Michigan even more suspicious.

Home Equity Theft in Montana

Michigan is not the only state guilty of using the practice of home equity theft. In Montana, local governments have been known to sell private homes of those with back taxes to “preferred” private investors, a practice that helped get the practice of home equity theft banned statewide just a few months ago.

Eighty-year-old electrician Gary Guidotti once owned four homes in Great Falls, Montana, which he rented out to help support himself and pay his bills. When the Great Recession hit in 2007, some of his tenants were no longer able to afford rent and stopped paying altogether. And without their rent helping to support him, Guidotti stopped paying his property taxes.

In 2008, Cascade County, Montana issued a tax lien of $1,125.45 on one of his homes. Just 17 months after issuing the lien, the county ended up selling it to a well-connected private entity for pennies on the dollar at $667.20. The private company, Sunrise Financial, acquired the deed to the property in 2011 and in 2015, sold the property for $139,300. Guidotti, of course, received no compensation from the sale of his home.

“This can’t be fair,” Guidotti said. “It (the law) has to be changed, but what’s the sense in fighting? The lawyers will have it all anyway. It’s just the way it goes.”

Without his properties, Guidotti was forced to move into a motorhome parked behind one of the homes that he used to own.

Challenging Home Equity Theft in Court

Our country was founded on the fervent belief that individuals have the right to their life, liberty, and, as is especially applicable here, their property. Greatly influenced by philosopher John Locke and his Second Treatise on Government, our country’s Founders understood how important property rights were to securing individual liberty and protecting Americans against government overreach.

In chapter five of Locke’s famous essay, “On Property,” he writes:

Though the earth, and all inferior creatures, be common to all men, yet every man has a property in his own person: this no body has any right to but himself. The labour of his body, and the work of his hands, we may say, are properly his. Whatsoever then he removes out of the state that nature hath provided, and left it in, he hath mixed his labour with, and joined to it something that is his own, and thereby makes it his property. It being by him removed from the common state nature hath placed it in, it hath by this labour something annexed to it, that excludes the common right of other men: for this labour being the unquestionable property of the labourer, no man but he can have a right to what that is once joined to (emphasis added), at least where there is enough, and as good, left in common for others.

When a person works, like Ramouldo Perez did, and uses the fruits of his or her labor to purchase property, that property is theirs and theirs alone. This respect for the sanctity of property rights has been one of the most defining characteristics of the American idea.

Yet, practices like home equity theft and civil asset forfeiture, which allow law enforcement to strip individuals of their property without due process, have belittled this sacred principle and harmed many innocent people in the process. The confiscation of a person’s property, especially over a few dollars of unpaid taxes, is thoroughly unAmerican. Private property should be protected by the government, not seized and sold off before an individual has an opportunity to remedy the situation.

The unconstitutional practice of home equity theft has allowed individuals to be stripped of their property without fair compensation. But there is hope that this practice could soon be reined in or perhaps even stopped altogether.

In May, after diligent efforts made by PLF, Montana passed Senate Bill 253, giving property owners further protections against home equity theft.

The new law protects homeowners’ equity by requiring homes be sold to the highest bidder. Now the extra profits must be returned to the former owner after deducting taxes, interest, penalties, and costs,

Christina Martin of the Pacific Legal recently wrote.

In addition to Perez v. Wayne County, this fall, the Michigan Supreme Court will also begin hearing oral arguments for Rafaeli v. Oakland County.

By Brittany Hunter | FEE.org

The views in this article may not reflect editorial policy of The Mind Unleashed.

(BI) — The cows grazed under a hot sun near a wooden bridge spanning a river in the Amazon. The quiet was occasionally broken by a motorbike growling along a dirt road that cut through the sprawling cattle ranch.

But the idyllic pasture was on land that the Lagoa do Triunfo ranch has been forbidden to use for cattle since 2010, when it was embargoed by Brazil’s environment agency Ibama as a punishment for deforestation. Nearby there were more signs of fresh pasture: short grass, feeding troughs, and fresh salt used to feed cattle — all in apparent contravention of rules designed to protect vital rainforest.

This vast 145,000 hectare ranch is one of several owned by AgroSB Agropecuária SA — a company known in the region as Santa Barbara. Located in an environmentally protected area, Lagoa do Triunfo is more than 600km from the capital of the Amazon state of Pará, on the western fringes of Brazil’s “agricultural frontier” — where farming eats into the rainforest.

An investigation by the Bureau, the Guardian and Repórter Brasil has found that cattle produced by Santa Barbara are being sold to JBS, the world’s biggest meat-packing company. JBS is the single biggest supplier of beef, chicken and leather globally, and exports fresh beef to Europe and about half of the corned beef eaten in the UK. In 2017, JBS said it had stopped buying Santa Barbara cattle, after it was fined $7.7 million for buying cows raised on illegally deforested land — but our investigation shows that is no longer the case.

The investigation found that last year the Lagoa do Triunfo ranch delivered hundreds of heads of cattle to some of Santa Barbara’s other farms for the final stage of fattening. Cattle was then sent from those farms to slaughter in JBS plants. Using GPS and publicly available maps and locations, reporters located cattle and pasture inside embargoed areas at Lagoa do Triunfo.

The revelations come as work by Trase, an NGO, shared exclusively with our team, has revealed how huge swathes of felled rainforest can be traced back to this cattle trade — and how beef raised on deforested land ends up in international supply chains.

Deforestation around Lagoa do Triunfo. The dot left of centre marks the location of the ranch

Embargoes — restrictions that ban farmers guilty of deforestation or environmental damage from using parts of their own land — are imposed by the Brazilian government and serve both as a punishment and a protective measure to allow land to recover. They can be more effective than fines because they come at a higher cost for farmers.

But our investigative team visited land clearly demarcated as embargoed on government websites, and found grazing cows there. A worker at the ranch said that cattle were left to roam in areas employees knew were embargoed. “You can’t cut down the vegetation,” the employee said. “The vegetation grows and we work the cattle inside.”

Santa Barbara is an enormous, powerful ranching empire, owned by the billionaire Daniel Dantas, that controls half a million hectares across Pará. In 2008 Dantas was twice arrested on bribery charges and handed a ten-year sentence as a result of a corruption investigation that also saw his land confiscated. The investigation’s findings were subsequently overturned, the sentence dropped and Dantas got all his land back.

Over the past decade, according to Repórter Brasil, Santa Barbara has been accused of illegal deforestation and faced allegations of using slave-like labour — accusations it strongly denies. Lagoa do Triunfo is one of its largest ranches. There are 12 separate embargoed areas on it, dating from 2010 to 2013.

The wild west on the edge of the Amazon

With a population of 125,000 people and over two million cattle, the nearby town of Sao Félix do Xingu, in Pará state, covers an area bigger than Scotland. Cattle ranching fed its growth from remote Amazon outpost to busy town. And there is money here: farmers’ wives are happy to pay $600 for a handbag, said Kelli Moraes, a 25-year-old sales assistant. “They are very fashion.”

Sao Félix do Xingu was mostly forest when Arlindo Rosa, now president of the town’s union of rural producers, arrived in 1993. “There was practically none of this farming … there was no highway, there was nothing,” he said.

“People came from outside with the spirit to raise cattle,” said his vice-president, Francisco Torres, who arrived in 1987. Santa Barbara, the region’s biggest ranching company, began buying land near Sao Félix do Xingu in 2006, Torres said.

Torres said many ranches in the area have suffered Ibama embargoes. “If they removed those embargoes, a lot would improve,” said Rosa. As is common with farmers and landowners in Amazon areas, both men were critical of what they saw as overzealous environmental controls. Rosa owes $1.4 million to Ibama in fines for deforestation, according to the agency’s website.

But embargoes have not stopped Santa Barbara illegally grazing cattle on deforested land, nor JBS being able to perfectly legally do business with the company, our investigation found.

JBS Beef Brazil’s “responsible procurement policy” says it “does not purchase animals from farms involved in deforestation of native forests … or that are embargoed” by Ibama. But the company has also said that the common practice of transferring cattle from one farm to another for fattening can make it impossible to trace individual cows.

Official state documents seen by the Bureau, the Guardian and Repórter Brasil showed that from January to October 2018, Santa Barbara delivered at least 296 cattle from the Lagoa do Triunfo ranch to its Espiríto Santo ranch in Xinguara, in the same state. Between July 2018 and January this year, Santa Barbara sent 2,900 cattle from the Espiríto Santo ranch to JBS slaughterhouses.

Throughout 2018, Santa Barbara also sent at least 729 cattle from the Lagoa do Triunfo ranch to be fattened at its Porto Rico ranch in Xinguara. In April 2018, 36 cattle from the Porto Rico ranch were sent to slaughter at a JBS plant.

JBS said that 99.9% of its cattle purchases meet its socio-environmental criteria and that it was working to implement “a new procedure to cover all links in the supply chain” and stop the use of “cattle from illegally deforested areas”.

Santa Barbara said it did not carry out deforestation to increase its area “but rather recovers degraded areas” and turns them into pastures. It said that trees on the Lagoa do Triunfo ranch had been felled before the Forest Code was introduced and that only 7% of the land is under embargo.

New research tracking beef cattle back to the ranches they were raised on has revealed the full extent of deforestation in the Amazon that is linked to a handful of global food corporations.

Trase, a supply chain research project developed by the Stockholm Environment Institute and Global Canopy, tracked livestock from deforested areas to abattoirs producing beef for international markets, as well as meat for domestic use. Up to 5,800 square kilometres of forest is being felled in the Amazon and other areas every year for cattle ranching.

The destruction of between 280-320 sq km of forest each year is linked to JBS’s supply chain for exported beef, according to the data assembled by Trase. There is no suggestion any Lagoa do Triunfo beef is exported.

JBS, which slaughters almost 35,000 cattle in Brazil per day, has faced a string of allegations relating to deforestation. In 2017, Brazil’s environmental protection agency, Ibama, raided and ordered the suspension of two JBS meat-packing plants in Pará accused of having purchased cattle raised on illegally deforested land between 2013 and 2016.

JBS denied the allegations but was fined R$24.7 million ($8 million). In the same year, a Guardian investigation with Repórter Brasil revealed how the company had purchased cattle linked to poor labour conditions and deforestation, resulting in UK supermarket Waitrose removing the company’s products from its shelves.

The findings come amid growing international concern over the looming impacts of climate change, with the Amazon forest seen by experts as a crucial buffer in stabilising regional and global climate.

Between 1980 and 2005, Amazon deforestation levels reached 20,000 sq km per year — with an area the size of Wales being lost. Although there have been political murmurings about trying to halt the destruction, the latest data shows that deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon has risen by 73% since 2012.

Erasmus zu Ermgassen, lead researcher at Trase, said: “Though some slaughterhouses monitor their direct suppliers and so in theory can avoid farms associated with deforestation, none monitor their indirect suppliers, who make up the bulk of their supply chain.”

Trase added: “There is a huge opportunity to reduce the deforestation associated with the production and exports of beef in Brazil. There is enormous potential to use land more efficiently and sustainably in the Brazilian beef sector, and to improve rural livelihoods by investing in cattle ranching on existing pasturelands.”

Trase will release the data in full later this month.

By Andrew Wasley, Alexandra Heal, Dom Phillips, Daniel Camargos, Mie Lainio, André Campos, Diego Junqueira | TheBureauInvestigates.com

The views in this article may not reflect editorial policy of The Mind Unleashed.

(TMU) — Last September, Arizona Public Service (APS) shut off Stephanie Pullman’s electricity. If they hadn’t, the 72-year-old very well may be alive today, according to Phoenix New Times.

Pullman was living in Sun City West, Arizona with her cat Cocoa when she received a letter from APS informing her that she owed the utility company $176.84. She had only five days to pay the bill before APS would disconnect her service.

It was August 23, 2018 and the temperature outside was in the triple digits.

APS’ shutoff warning sent to Stephanie Pullman, dated August 23, 2018. Jeanine Smith

At the time, she was living on her Social Security income, which amounted to less than $1,000 per month. In an effort to help their mom, Pullman’s children covered her bills and helped with unexpected costs when needed. For example, in April of the same year, when Pullman’s air conditioner broke, her children had it repaired. Pullman’s daughter, Jeanine Smith, paid the phone bill and another daughter, Chris Hotes, paid for the internet.

According to Pullman’s final electric bill, she didn’t pay her balance with APS before the deadline of August 28. But APS didn’t cut her service. Instead, Pullman paid the utility company $125 on September 5, one day after she typically received her Social Security check.

Despite the payment, APS turn off Pullman’s electricity two days later, on September 7. Records indicate local temperatures reached 105 degrees that day and a nearby town recorded a high temperature of 107.

The following week, Hotes called the Sun City West Posse, after becoming alarming at not having heard from her mother. The group, responsible for conducting local wellness checks, alerted the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office.

When they entered Pullman’s home that day, they found the 72-year-old woman in her bed—dead. According to the coroner’s report, her body was already in a state of decomposition thanks to the heat—a direct result of lack of air conditioning due to no electricity.

According to the medical examiner, Pullman’s death was caused by “environmental heat exposure in setting of significant cardiovascular disease.” In short, APS caused Pullman’s death.

Smith maintains that her mother was unaware that her electricity was at risk of being shut off. Had Pullman mentioned it to any of her children, they would have immediately covered the bill.

“We would’ve never let her power go out,” Smith said. “Never.”

Maricopa County began tracking heat-related deaths in 2006 and the county has seen a sharp increase over the last three years. 154 people died from heat-related causes in 2016, 179 in 2017, and 182 last year, in 2018. According to the data, 119 of those deaths were directly related to heat whereas in 63 cases heat was a contributing factor.

The data revealed something unexpected—40% of deaths happened indoors.

The data also shows that heat-related deaths can be predicted by socioeconomic status. Maricopa County residents who are older, isolated, or more financially unstable are at greater risk, much like in many other localities across the country.

“It seems like more and more people are not able to afford to keep the air conditioning on,” Dr. Vjollca Berisha, senior epidemiologist with the Maricopa County Department of Public Health, said. Berisha stresses that utility companies need to cut customers a break, especially during the peak—and potentially deadly—summer months.

Smith last heard from her mother via email on September 5. Pullman thanked her daughter for having her phone repaired. “The phone is fixed, thank you very much, love you, bye,” the email read.

One day earlier, Hotes spoke to her mother by phone. During that call, Pullman requested help paying for her water bill, to which Hotes replied she would. On September 7 Hotes left her mother a message telling her to keep an eye out for the money she sent.

Hotes never heard back from her mother and the medical examiner’s report did not indicate on which day Pullman likely died.

Because Pullman was $51.84 short when she paid her APS bill, her electricity was disconnected. According to the shut off warning she received, if Pullman later wished to reconnect it, which would be assumed in triple digit heat, Pullman would owe up to $135 for that service—ten dollars more than she was able to pay only days prior. With those charges, outstanding balance, taxes and more, Pullman was set to owe a shocking $335.57.

The 72-year-old’s final bill indicated that she owed $287.86, after her $125 payment. This bill included a “field call charge” of $10.65, which was incurred on September 5.

A field call charge is incurred “when an authorized Company representative travels to the Customer’s site to accept payment on a delinquent account, notify of service termination, make payment arrangements, or terminate the service,” according to a schedule filed with the Arizona Corporation Commission by Arizona Public Service.

If a representative does indeed travel to the customer’s home when the charge is incurred, this means someone from APS visited Pullman’s home mere days before her death, informing her face-to-face to face that her electricity was being shut off during a deadly heatwave.

During a phone call with APS, Smith told the representative on the other end “You ended my mom’s life for $51.”

The following month she left a review for the utility company on the Consumer Affairs website, giving them only one star. Smith said:

“It’s not like she didn’t pay anything. She paid $125. She still had to eat. She still had to buy toilet paper. She had to pay her mortgage. The details just made me ill.”

While there are rules in Arizona regarding when a utility can and cannot cut service, the exact circumstances are vague and unclear. And, in Stephanie Pullman’s case, neither she nor APS had the necessary information anyway.

According to Arizona’s Administrative Code, a utility cannot be disconnected if the customer can prove that “termination would be especially dangerous” to their health via medical documents. The code also indicates that service cannot be shut off “where weather will be especially dangerous to health,” but does not include specific weather events, temperatures, or dates.

The code also indicates that service cannot be cut when “ill, elderly, or handicapped persons” cannot pay their bill. The code does note that service can be cut if the customer is aware but not taking advantage of “the availability of funds from various government and social assistance agencies of which the utility is aware.”

Pullman, a 72-year-old grandmother with heart disease and Type II diabetes may have qualified as “elderly” or “ill” but APS was unaware of either of these things and did not inform her of Arizona’s Administrative Code, information that may have saved her life.

Regardless of the information that Pullman did or did not have about how her age and health may impact the potential for shut-off, the soaring temperatures that day should have prevented APS from cutting her service. But, according to APS, temperatures of 105-107 degrees is not “dangerous to health.”

Jill Hanks, a spokesperson for APS, said in an email:

“APS does not disconnect service for non-payment on extreme heat days as determined by weather experts.

We use multiple third-party weather services, including the National Weather Service, to alert us when weather conditions may be dangerous to a person’s health.”

In Maricopa County, where Pullman lived, the National Weather Service issues excessive heat warnings only when temperatures reach or exceed 110 degrees. Typical advice given during times of high heat include staying indoors, in air conditioning.

Senate Bill 1542 sought to change the process by creating a law protecting residents from shutoffs during extreme weather that would cover all utility companies.

Stacey Champion, local activist and author of the bill, said:

“Arizonans currently have no date- or temperature-based protection for utility shutoffs during extreme heat or cold, and this needs to be viewed as the public health crisis it is.”

Adding, “It is literally a matter of life or death.”

According to Phoenix New Times, the bill, “would have barred utilities in Arizona from disconnecting service when outside temperatures were forecast to fall below 32 degrees Fahrenheit or exceed 90 degrees. It also stipulated that utilities had to make “reasonable payment arrangements” with a customer before cutting service; if the customer didn’t honor that arrangement, then the utility could disconnect service only when temperatures were above 32 degrees or below 90, depending on the season.”

“It also would have unconditionally prohibited utilities from disconnecting service to a person or family if their household income fell below 200 percent of the federal poverty line and they made a minimum payment, or if an elderly person, pregnant person, child under the age of 5, or person on life support lived in the home. The bill also contained other stipulations aimed at protecting people with low incomes from being disconnected.”

But the bill never made it out of committee.

Smith maintains that if her mother had been aware that her electricity was at risk of being cut off, she would have asked family for help. Of Arizona Public Service, Smith said she didn’t want to talk to them again.

“There’s nothing they can do or say to change it. I just want policy change.”

APS began a temporary suspension of all disconnections for customers that are behind on their bills on Wednesday, saying they would take a step back and rethink their shutoff practices.

For now, the suspension is indefinite. APS claims to already have been re-evaluating shutoff policy, but hearing of Pullman’s case “factored into our decision to put that into effect.”

By Emma Fiala | Creative Commons | TheMindUnleashed.com

In a shocking resignation letter dated March 28, 1999, a 3M environmental specialist accused the company of being more concerned with profits and image than environmental safety.

According to Richard Purdy who penned the scathing letter, PFOS “is the most insidious pollutant since PCB” and is the cause for a potential health crisis across the entire country, but most notably in the state of Michigan. PFOS is used in 3M’s ScotchGard stain-protection product line and isn’t the only PFAS chemical the company uses.

“It is probably more damaging than PCB because it does not degrade, whereas PCB does; it is more toxic to wildlife,” the letter reads.

“I have worked within the system to learn more about this chemical and to make the company aware of the dangers associated with its continued use,” Purdy wrote. “But I have continually met roadblocks, delays, and indecision. For weeks on end, I have received assurances that my samples would be analyzed soon — never to see results. There are always excuses and little is accomplished.”

A new report by the Environmental Working Group (EWG) and Northeastern University has found that people in 43 states in the United States are exposed to drinking water contaminated with PFAS chemicals, of which PFOS is one.

Michigan has been hit hardest, with at least 46 sites where groundwater has PFAS levels above the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) lifetime health advisory guideline. According to Detroit Free Press, “The Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes and Energy has estimated PFAS could be found at more than 11,300 sites in Michigan” including 17 bodies of water with “‘do not eat’ fish advisories, or limitations on consumption of fish, because of PFOS contamination.”

The revealing resignation letter was recently obtained by the Detroit Free Press along with numerous internal 3M documents. The documents were obtained by then-Minnesota Attorney General Lori Swanson during a 2010 lawsuit alleging environmental contamination by 3M in the state of Minnesota. The lawsuit was settled for $850 million in 2018.

While PFAS chemicals have proved useful in numerous applications including cleaning products, waterproof clothing, nonstick cookware, textiles, grease-resistant food packaging, leather, paper goods, paint and more, the very same properties that make it so successful in these applications is what makes it so harmful to environment. PFAS compounds are nearly indestructible, with some referring to them as “the forever chemicals.”

But the same qualities that made PFAS compounds so useful also makes them almost indestructible in the environment, giving them the ominous nickname “the forever chemicals.”

Documents show that 3M was, in fact, aware of PFAS toxicity in lab rats all the way back in 1950. In the mid-1970s, health concerns arose after studies of fish, rats, and monkeys. The problems were so prevalent, that the company became aware of rising levels of PFAS compounds in their employees’ blood along with a link to testicular cancer. PFAS compounds were “found to be completely resistant to biodegradation” way back in 1978.

PFAS, which have been linked to a host of medical conditions such as cancer, thyroid problems, hormone imbalances, pre-eclampsia, learning disabilities and more, are found in the blood of almost 99% of Americans.

Documents obtained during the 2010 lawsuit revealed, not only this shocking resignation letter, but documents outlining 3M’s research into PFAS compounds. It turns out, 3M has been well aware for years that the compounds do not break down in the environment as expected, that they were found in both the blood of employees and the public, and laboratory rats and other animals were experiencing negative health effects.

Despite the revelations, 3M continued to sell PFAS compounds used in a range of products including things that touch both human skin as well as food. The company also neglected to inform the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

However, in the 1990s, the EPA became increasingly aware of researching showing the presence of PFAS compounds in the environment and reached an agreement with 3M in 2000 to phase out the use of PFOS by 2003. While 3M stopped using PFOA in 2000, other companies—including DuPont, the company responsible for Teflon—continued their use until an agreement with the EPA to phase them out by 2015.

According to Purdy’s 1999 letter, the environmental specialist argued years before any action was taken that 3M had already “waited too long to tell customers about the widespread dispersal of PFOS in people and the environment.”

“3M continues to make and sell these chemicals, though the company knows of an ecological risk assessment I did that indicates there is a better than 100% probability that perfluorooctansulfonate (PFOS) is biomagnifying in the food chain and harming sea mammals. This chemical is more stable than many rocks.” 

“3M told those of us working on the fluorochemical project not to write down our thoughts or have email discussions on issues because of how our speculations could be viewed in a legal discovery process. This has stymied intellectual development on the issue, and stifled discussion on the serious ethical implications of decisions.”

Now, almost 10 years after the 2010 lawsuit in Minnesota, a new one in Michigan is using the very same internal documents.

Both current and former residents of the small midwest town of Parchment, Michigan are suing 3M and Georgia-Pacific over a toxic mess left in a landfill. PFAS compounds have leached from the landfill into the town’s water supply thanks to a paper mill responsible for manufacturing food safe paper coated with 3M’s product. As a result, thousands of current and former residents of the town were unknowingly exposed to high levels of the compound via municipal drinking water.

Nicholas Coulson, the Detroit environmental class-action attorney who is bringing the lawsuit against 3M said of the allegations against the company, “What we’re alleging that 3M did is really a crime against humanity.”

“It’s an absolute outrage that, in the name of profit, for decades they suppressed this information, and they continued to pump these chemicals out in incredible quantities into the natural environment. And the terrible result of that is that some communities, like Parchment, have had to bear the brunt of it.”

“3M had really, really sufficient notice to know that, one, these things don’t go away, they build up and build up and build up, both in the environment and the body, and two, that they cause really harmful effects,” Coulson added.

In his 1999 resignation letter, Richard Purdy concluded:

“I have worked to the best of my ability within the system to see that the right actions are taken on behalf of the environment. At almost every step, I have been assured that action will be taken—yet I see slow or no results. I am told the company is concerned, but their actions speak to different concerns than mine. I can no longer participate in the process that 3M has established for the management of PFOS and precursors. For me it is unethical to be concerned with markets, legal defensibility and image over environmental safety.”

Purdy wasn’t the only one to sound the alarm. The documents reveal that, dating back to the 1970s, numerous employees—including an employee named M.T. Case who author memos revealing toxicity, another who went by Dr. King, and Eric Reiner who worked in the company’s Environmental Engineering and Pollution Control division—urged the company to act on the research.

In a response to the Detroit Free Press, 3M seemingly bragged of their dedication to “research, technology, and clean-up” while calling the story gleaned from the internal documents “incomplete and misleading“:

“3M has dedicated substantial time and resources to researching PFAS and, to that end, we have invested more than $600 million on research, technology, and clean-up efforts related to PFAS. As a responsible steward of our community, we have a record of sharing information we learn with government regulators, the scientific community, as well as local and federal officials.

The small set of documents from the Minnesota litigation portrays an incomplete and misleading story that distorts the full record regarding 3M’s actions with respect to PFOA and PFOS, as well as who we are as a company. 3M acted responsibly in connection with products containing PFAS and we will vigorously defend our environmental stewardship.”

With 19 million people in 43 U.S. states currently exposed to drinking water contaminated with PFAS chemicals, the task of cleaning up these “forever chemicals” that are reportedly more stable than some rocks, is daunting. Companies like 3M that repeatedly prioritize profits and production of their products over people must be held accountable for the havoc wreaked on the environment, their customers, and their employees. While 3M did lose its $300 million/year revenue-maker ScotchGard after the 2000 agreement with the EPA, the loss only represented a mere 2% of 3M’s total sales. And while 3M bragged in their response to the Detroit Free Press of the $600 million spent on “research, technology, and clean-up efforts related to PFAS,” those amounts pale in comparison to the company’s profits, including the $7.9 billion earned in sales in the forth quarter of 2018 alone.

Time and time again, massive corporations that have caused harm—either knowingly or not—are tasked with clean-up costs or fines that barely make a dent in their bottomline. Without significant consequences for their actions, corporations like 3M will likely continue to prioritize profits over the health of the environment and even their customers. Perhaps the newest lawsuit against 3M will finally hold the company accountable to a degree that will impact the future.

Sometimes life mimics fiction. And sometimes life is so much stranger than fiction you have to double check the headlines to ensure they aren’t satire. The latest doubletake comes from New Jersey, where, under the guise of environmentalism, local legislators have passed a new tax on—wait for it— the rain.

Governments are known for a lack of creativity and an uncanny ability to think only inside the box. However, when it comes to getting creative with inventing new forms of taxation, they never disappoint. Chicago, for example, recently implemented a “PlayStation” tax on its residents as part of the city’s previously existing “amusement tax,” which, just as it sounds, taxes individuals on almost all forms of entertainment.

California, on the other hand, recently tried to get away with unprecedented levels of extortion when it tried to tax residents for their drinking water and text messages. The water tax is still on the table, but luckily, the Golden State did not succumb to the new ridiculous texting tax. New Jersey, though, might not be so lucky.

Blame It on the Rain

To be perfectly clear, while the new tax is being referred to as the “rain tax,” it doesn’t actually tax the rain itself, but that doesn’t make the context of the legislation any less absurd.

Bill S-1073 seeks to penalize businesses and homeowners whose property contains paved surfaces, like a driveway or a parking lot. When it rains, the rain acts as a medium, transporting any pollutants it picks up from paved surfaces, like brine and rock salt, and then depositing it into sewers and drains. And since the pollutants are thought to have originated from paved surfaces, the state has determined that property owners are responsible for any negative environmental impacts that result therein and should be penalized accordingly.

The legislation itself does not actually allow the state to collect any taxes, however. Instead, it allows each of its 565 different municipalities to create their own stormwater utility systems to minimize the runoff problem. Each locality will then charge each homeowner and business based on what the bill calls “a fair and equitable approximation” of how much runoff is generated from their property.

The legislation states:

Under the bill, a county, municipality, or authority (local unit) that establishes a stormwater utility is authorized to charge and collect reasonable fees and other charges to recover the stormwater utility’s costs for stormwater management.

As is the trend these days, supporters are praising the bill as a heroic move to protect the environment, though there is no real evidence that any significant harm is being done. Yet, legislators would have you believe there is a crisis at hand.

Senate President Steve Sweeney tried to convey the seriousness of the problem, saying, “With all the salt we’ve had on roads recently, that’s all running into the sewer systems, so you don’t ignore the problems because they don’t go away.” However, this winter has actually been mild for the state, with fewer snow falls than usual, meaning there has not been any sudden influx of rock salt pouring into the sewer systems this season.

A local writer, E.W. Boyle, highlighted the true idiocy of this proposed tax, writing:

Now, since our roads have been treated during winter storm events for over 80 years, with no apparent environmental impact, one wonders what took them so long to notice that there is salt runoff into creeks, streams and estuary rivers during subsequent rain events. No, rather what they noticed was the potential for yet another tax levy.

Boyle hits the nail on the head, and he is not alone in his opposition to the new tax. Republican state senator Tom Kean Jr. also criticized this proposal for the burden it places on New Jersey residents. Since each municipality is in charge of setting its own rules regarding the collection of this tax with very little oversight from any other governing entity, it is ripe for potential abuse. Keane said, “We all want to protect our environment. We all want to preserve it for future generations, but this is a weighted tax.” He continued, “The citizens of New Jersey…really [have] no way to defend themselves against tax increases at local levels.”

Since the bill gives local governments carte blanche to set the rates and collect the revenue, it makes it harder for residents to voice their concern if they believe they are being asked to pay too much. Keane later added:

…you shouldn’t create unfair authorities with uneven taxing practices…You’re creating a new layer of government that will not be regulated. The concern is uneven enforcement.

While uneven enforcement is certainly a concern, it is not the only problem the new rain tax inflicts on New Jersey residents. The legislation also comes with a hefty price tag that property owners will be responsible for footing.

From Bad to Worse

New Jersey is currently one of the most heavily taxed states in the country. And yet, it is going to burden its residents even further with the passing of this bill. According to the EPA, it will cost the state of New Jersey $15.6 billion to upgrade its storm drain system. However, the cost to Garden State taxpayers could end up being significantly higher.

New Jersey’s Office of Legislative Services, which usually determines the fiscal impact of state policies, could not shed any light on what this might actually cost residents. Since each local municipality is in charge of setting its own rates for each property owner, there is really no way of estimating the projected costs at this time. And given the nature of government, it is highly probable that taxpayers will end up paying more than their “fair” share of the burden.

Chris Sturm, a supporter of the bill and a water policy “expert” at the nonprofit organization New Jersey Future, attempted to downplay the impact this will have on homeowners. Sturm commented, “This will be negligible for the vast majority of homeowners. This is for properties that have large impervious surfaces.” While no one, including state officials, is sure of the fiscal impact this will have on residents, there is something else quite disturbing about his statement.

These properties with “large impervious surfaces” are places of business. They are the very institutions responsible for creating jobs, wealth, and prosperity within the state. And yet, rather than celebrating these titans of industry for their contributions, state lawmakers are attempting to impose onerous taxes on them. This is yet another example of governments using their taxing powers to turn private businesses into their personal coffers.

To make matters worse, any individual or business who does not pay their “rain tax” will be charged interest and have a tax lien imposed on them by the state, the very same type of action taken against those who fail to pay their property taxes.

New Jersey is, unfortunately, not the first state to attempt to inflict this type of tax on its residents. In 2012, Maryland instituted its own version of the rain tax, but it was not received well by the taxpayers. In 2014, Republican Governor Larry Hogan altered the law and allowed nine counties and the city of Baltimore to opt out of the state’s rain tax, so long as each municipality promised to address the Chesapeake Bay runoff issue on their own.

Hogan commented, “Passing a state law that forces counties to raise taxes on their citizens against their will is not the best way to address the issue.”

New Jersey does not feel the same way.

New Jersey legislators have done their constituents a great disservice by passing this bill. And now, the legislation is currently sitting on the desk of Governor Phil Murphy. It is expected that it will be signed any day now. This gives new life to the saying, “when it rains, it pours.”

Opinion by Brittany Hunter / Creative Commons / FEE.org