US Strikes Causing Civilian Casualties More Than Doubled in Afghanistan This Year

The number of US strikes leading to civilian casualties has more than doubled in the first nine months of this year compared to the previous one, a UN report has found, in a trend it has called “worrying”.

The report, by the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (Unama), said that the civilian casualty toll from strikes, both Afghan and US, had already surpassed that of all other entire years since they began recording casualties in 2009.

The UN body found strikes between January and September killed 313 civilians and injured a further 336, with the US responsible for just over half of these. As a whole, the number of civilian casualties from strikes rose by 39 per cent.

The report comes shortly after the UN announced two strikes had likely both killed mostly women and children belonging to the same families.

Data recently obtained by the Bureau shows that the US carried out strikes in the provinces where the civilian casualties occurred and on the same days, however a US spokesperson has said that there were “no connections” between their actions and the allegations.

There is no clear explanation as to why civilian casualties from strikes have risen. It could be down to an increase in air operations, but, until last month, we had been unable to get strike data from the US.

Data released by the US Air Force does show that strikes in July were at their highest since November 2010, but since then, the usual monthly data has stopped.

By  / Creative Commons / The Bureau

While you’re here…
…We have a tiny favor to ask of you. Government think tanks have teamed up with social media companies and Google to censor independent media websites and government criticism. Despite this big tech crackdown on the free press, we have been very fortunate, and tens of thousands of people continue to read The Mind Unleashed every single day. But we need your ongoing support to keep working as we do.. And because we value open and accessible information for all, we would never hide our content behind a paywall. Unlike Fox News or CNN, our editorial independence means we set our own agenda and voice our own opinions. We are not subject to the whims of billionaire shareholders. We are editorially independent, and that makes websites like this an important part in the war for truth and justice. Hopefully we’re wrong, but without your help, we're afraid big tech companies may soon make The Mind Unleashed algorithmically disappear from the Internet. We need your support to keep delivering quality independent news. Every contribution, big or small, will go directly into funding independent journalism. Thank you. Click here to support us

View Comments