Connect with us


Food Poisoning Expert Reveals the 6 Foods He’ll Never Eat Again

Though food poisoning is rarely fatal, it is absolutely avoidable.



raw meat food poisoning
Like this article? Get the latest from The Mind Unleashed in your inbox. Sign up right here.

(TMU) — If you’ve ever tried sushi from a gas station or kept a burrito in your backpack for too long, you’ve probably experienced food poisoning.  The symptoms, which range from uncontrollable diarrhea to vomiting, are uncomfortable to say the least. 

Though food poisoning is rarely fatal, it is absolutely avoidable. Attorney Bill Marler, who specializes in foodborne illness cases, knows this fact all too well. Over the past two decades, he has won his clients over $600 million in settlement money. He is also litigating suits against Chipotle for the chain’s E. Coli and norovirus outbreaks.

These are the six foods Marler refuses to eat:

1) Raw Oysters

oysters food poisoning

Image credit: Richard Toller

According to Marler, raw oysters have been linked to more food borne illnesses in the past five years than in the two preceding decades. The culprit? Warming waters. Due to climate change, bodies of water are heating up and, as a result, microbial growth is thriving. That thriving bacteria is ending up in the raw oysters consumers are happily slurping down.

2) Precut Fruits and Vegetables

fruits and vegetables food poisoning

Image credit: Ryan Dinkgrave

Another food Marler avoids “like the plague” is precut and pre-washed fruits and vegetables. The convenience is overlooked by the fact that handling and processing the food increases the chance of contamination. The attorney says it’s simply not worth the risk.

3) Raw Sprouts

sprouts food poisoning

Image credit: Stephanie189

Sprouts are incredibly nutritious for you, but they are also a likely source of foodborne illness. More than 30 bacterial outbreaks—primarily salmonella and E. Coli—have occurred in the past two decades thanks to sprouts.

“There have been too many outbreaks to not pay attention to the risk of sprout contamination,” Marler said. “Those are products that I just don’t eat at all.”

4) Rare and Raw Meat

raw meat food poisoning

Image credit: Pixabay

The “carnivore diet” may be growing in popularity, but Marler is unconvinced of the “benefits” of eating raw and undercooked meat. In fact, he says it should be avoided to prevent food poisoning. The attorney says to avoid foodborne illness, all meat needs to be cooked to 160 degrees throughout. This kills bacteria that could cause E. Coli or salmonella.

5) Uncooked Eggs

raw eggs food poisoning

Image credit: Tim Ellis

If you’re tempted to throw a raw egg (or several) into your morning smoothie, please don’t. Marler says the chance of getting food poisoning from raw eggs is much lower than it was in the 80’s and 90’s, but is still a likelihood. It looks like breakfast will be scrambled.

6) Unpasteurized Juices and Milk

milk food poisoning

Image credit: Piccolo Mostro

The “live food” movement is a popular trend due to the theory that cooking food depletes nutrients, destroys enzymes, and distorts protein. But, heating juices and milk sold on a large scale may be necessary, simply to reduce the risk of contracting foodborne illness.

Marler says that while pasteurization is not dangerous, raw beverages can be. “There’s no benefit big enough to take away the risk of drinking products that can be made safe by pasteurization,” he said.

By  | Creative Commons |

Typos, corrections and/or news tips? Email us at [email protected]


Biden to Ban Menthol Cigarettes, Citing Health Impact on Youth and Black People



Like this article? Get the latest from The Mind Unleashed in your inbox. Sign up right here.

The Biden administration is reportedly planning to propose an immediate ban on menthol cigarettes, a product that has long been targeted by anti-smoking advocates and critics who claim that the tobacco industry has aggressively marketed to Black people in the U.S.

On Wednesday, the Washington Post reported that the administration could announce a ban on menthol and other flavored cigarettes as soon as this week.

Roughly 85 percent of Black smokers use such menthol brands as Newport and Kool, according to the Food and Drug Administration. Research has also found that menthol cigarettes are easier to become addicted to and harder to quit than unflavored tobacco products, along with other small cigars popular with young people and African Americans.

Civil rights advocates claim that the decision should be greeted by Black communities and people of color who have been marketed to by what they describe as the predatory tobacco industry.

Black smokers generally smoke far less than white smokers, but suffer a disproportionate amount of deaths due to tobacco-linked diseases like heart attack, stroke, and other causes.

Anti-smoking advocates like Matthew L. Myers, president of Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, also greeted the move to cut out products that appeal to children and young adults.

“Menthol cigarettes are the No. 1 cause of youth smoking in the United States,” he said. “Eliminating menthol cigarettes and flavored cigars used by so many kids will do more in the long run to reduce tobacco-related disease than any action the federal government has ever taken.”

However, groups including the American Civil Liberties Group (ACLU) has opposed the move, citing the likelihood that such an action could lead to criminal penalties arising from the enforcement of a ban hitting communities of color hardest.

In a letter to administration officials, the ACLU and other groups including the Drug Policy Alliance said that while the ban is “no doubt well-intentioned” it would also have “serious racial justice implications.”

“Such a ban will trigger criminal penalties, which will disproportionately impact people of color, as well as prioritize criminalization over public health and harm reduction,” the letter explained. “A ban will also lead to unconstitutional policing and other negative interactions with local law enforcement.”

Typos, corrections and/or news tips? Email us at [email protected]

Continue Reading


Pollution Is Making Human Penises Shrink and Causing a Collapse of Fertility, Scientists Say



Like this article? Get the latest from The Mind Unleashed in your inbox. Sign up right here.

With many still scoffing at the idea of rampant pollution posing a threat to humanity, a new study could drastically change the conversation: the chemicals across our environment could be the cause of shrinking human penises.

According to a new book by Dr. Shanna H. Swan, conditions in the modern world are quickly altering the reproductive development of humans and posing a threat to our future as a species.

The argument is laid out in her new book Count Down: How Our Modern World Is Threatening Sperm Counts, Altering Male and Female Reproductive Development, and Imperiling the Future of the Human Race.

The book discusses how pollution is not only leading to skyrocketing erectile dysfunction rates and fertility decline, but also an expansion in the number of babies born with small penises.

While it may seem like good fodder for jokes, the research could portend a grim future for humanity’s ability to survive.

Swan co-authored a study in 2017 that found sperm counts had precipitously fallen in Western countries by 59 percent between 1973 and 2011. In her latest book, Swan blames chemicals for this crisis in the making.

“Chemicals in our environment and unhealthy lifestyle practices in our modern world are disrupting our hormonal balance, causing various degrees of reproductive havoc,” she wrote in the new book.

“In some parts of the world, the average twentysomething woman today is less fertile than her grandmother was at 35,” she also wrote, noting that men could have only half the sperm count of their grandfathers.

Swan blames the disruption on phthalates, the chemicals used in plastic manufacturing that also have an impact on how the crucial hormone endocrine is produced

However, experts note that the proper implementation of pollution reduction measures could help humanity prevent the collapse of human fertility.

Typos, corrections and/or news tips? Email us at [email protected]

Continue Reading


Visualizing The World’s Deadliest Pandemics By Population Impact



Like this article? Get the latest from The Mind Unleashed in your inbox. Sign up right here.

Humanity has been battling against disease for centuries.

And while most contagious outbreaks have never reached full-blown pandemic status, Visual Capitalist’s Carmen Ang notes that there have been several times throughout history when a disease has caused mass devastation.

Here’s a look at the world’s deadliest pandemics to date, viewed from the lens of the impact they had on the global population at the time.

Editor’s note: The above graphic was created in response to a popular request from users after viewing our popular history of pandemics infographic initially released a year ago.

Death Toll, by Percent of Population

In the mid-1300s, a plague known as the Black Death claimed the lives of roughly 200 million people – more than 50% of the global population at that time.

Here’s how the death toll by population stacks up for other significant pandemics, including COVID-19 so far.

The specific cause of the Black Death is still up for debate. Many experts claim the 14th-century pandemic was caused by a bubonic plague, meaning there was no human-to-human transmission, while others argue it was possibly pneumonic.

Interestingly, the plague still exists today – however, it’s significantly less deadly, thanks to modern antibiotics.

History Repeats, But at Least We Keep Learning

While we clearly haven’t eradicated infection diseases from our lives entirely, we’ve at least come a long way in our understanding of what causes illness in the first place.

In ancient times, people believed gods and spirits caused diseases and widespread destruction. But by the 19th century, a scientist named Louis Pasteur (based on findings by Robert Koch) discovered germ theory – the idea that small organisms caused disease.

What will we discover next, and how will it impact our response to disease in the future?

Like this? Check out the full-length article The History of Pandemics

Republished from ZH with permission.

Typos, corrections and/or news tips? Email us at [email protected]

Continue Reading


The Mind Unleashed